$1.25M Verdict Returned Against Boehringer Ingelheim Over Pradaxa Blood Thinner
A federal jury in West Virginia found Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. liable for the death of an 84-year-old woman who took the blood thinner drug Pradaxa. The company plans to appeal.
October 19, 2018 at 01:27 PM
4 minute read
Ridgefield, Connecticut-based Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. was not upfront about the risks of its blood thinner, Pradaxa, a federal jury found Wednesday evening before returning a $1.25 million award for the family of an 84-year-old woman who died of severe bleeding.
The nine-person jury in the Southern District of West Virginia, Huntington Division, found for the family of Betty Knight on the count of fraud, awarding $50,000 in medical expenses and $200,000 in pain and suffering. It also awarded the family $1 million in punitive damages. But jurors found for the company, which is headquartered in Germany, on the first four counts regarding adequacy of warning labels and warrant claims.
Boehringer said in a statement that it would appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia.
The verdict was the first time the company was found liable in a lawsuit regarding the relatively new drug. The company prevailed in three court cases this year, including one earlier this month in Hartford.
Related story: Covington, Shipman & Goodwin Prevail in Another Defense of Pradaxa
Attorneys for the family maintained Knight suffered severe bleeding, which eventually led to her death in September 2013, because of her use of Pradaxa.
“They have tried to market a drug that should be monitored so people do not get too much in their blood,” said lead plaintiff attorney C. Andrew Childers, of Atlanta-based Childers, Schlueter & Smith. “They have marketed it as 'You never need to have your blood level checked,' and people are walking around with no idea they are over-anti-coagulated.”
Childers told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday that Pradaxa, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2010, “is not a terrible drug, overall. But the way it is being marketed is causing people to hurt unnecessarily, especially when there are other drug options out there. For some people, it's just not their drug. With people who have any types of problems with their kidney[, which Knight did], you have to monitor it.”
'Misunderstanding'
Before Pradaxa was approved, Warfarin, which was sold under the brand name Coumadin, was the only oral anti-coagulant available in the country for reducing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.
In his opening statement to the jury, Childers said the company knew monitoring the drug would “kill sales.”
“You can't sell this new class of drugs if you tell doctors and patients, 'You've got to keep getting your blood monitored just the way you are now,”' he said.
But opposing counsel, Covington & Burling's Phyllis Jones, rebutted in her opening statement by evoking images of a frail patient with multiple medical problems not associated with Pradaxa use.
“Mrs. Knight didn't just have a couple of conditions that her doctors were helping her manage,” Jones told the jury. “You will see throughout the course of this case that she had a number of serious chronic medical conditions that her doctors were helping her with: serious kidney disease, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes. She had chronic weakness.”
Related story: Litigators of the Week: A Compassionate—But Effective—Product Liability Defense
Jones did not respond to a request for comment Friday, but Boehringer emailed a statement to the Connecticut Law Tribune promising an appeal.
“We are disappointed that the jury ruled for the plaintiffs on their fraud claim, which appears to be a misunderstanding of unique legal issues in this case and contrary to the evidence presented here,” the statement read. “We will pursue all avenues of appeal.”
There are nearly 3,000 Pradaxa cases pending nationwide, including more than 2,600 on the Connecticut consolidated Pradaxa docket.
In addition to Childers, the family's counsel includes Neal Moskow of Ury & Mokow, and Russell Abney and Hunter Linville of the Atlanta offices of Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough.
Along with Jones, Boehringer Ingelheim's legal team includes Nicholas Hailey and Jessica Perez of Convington, John Lewis of the Cleveland office of Tucker Ellis, and Gretchen Callas of the West Virginia office of Jackson Kelly. None of the defense attorneys responded to a request for comment Friday.
Read the verdict:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
- 2MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
- 3Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
- 4People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250