Recognizing Injustice Is Patriotic
What makes America the country it is is everyone has the right to decide what statement they wish to make, and the government cannot stop that.
October 26, 2018 at 10:39 AM
3 minute read
Racial disparity in police use of force is a serious problem. At the close of August, 694 people had been shot and killed by the police, according to The Washington Post.
The Post calculated 15 more deaths than the previous year. Of those deaths, 121, or 17.4 percent, were African-American. The U.S. Census Bureau estimated African-Americans comprised 13.4 percent of the U.S. population in 2017.
According to the Center for Policing Equity, a July 2016 study revealed a greater incidence of police use of force against African-Americans, including when controlling for racial distributions in arrests.
More specifically, the study found that the overall mean use-of-force rate for African-Americans was 273 per 100,000, which is 2.5 times the overall rate, and 3.6 times the rate for whites (76 per 100,000).
For those who were arrested, the mean use of force rate for African-Americans was 46 per 1,000, while for whites it was 36 per 1,000. Although no study has been done connecting the two, the data kept by The Washington Post is consistent with the findings by the Center for Policing Equity.
While some police departments are taking steps to address these issues (see “Confronting Implicit Bias in the New York Police Department,” The New York Times, July 15, 2018), the problem has not gone away. It is encouraging, however, to see more recognition of the problem and more willingness to confront the causes.
During football season, we consider it important to recognize what NFL players who have knelt during the national anthem are doing. They are protesting police violence, oppression and brutality. They are not, despite exhortations to the contrary, protesting the national anthem or the flag. From the beginning, the players have been clear: they are protesting “systemic oppression of people of color, police brutality, and the criminal justice system,” and “we chose to kneel because it's a respectful gesture.”
Police violence is a serious issue, and these players should be recognized for trying to raise awareness of the problem.
Government officials who criticize NFL players for protesting “the flag,” while ignoring the police violence they are actually protesting, and calling for the players' firing, have a chilling effect that goes against the prescriptions of the Constitution. Civic engagement and an interested citizenry are essential to a functioning democracy, and peaceful protest is one of the means to voice citizen concern. It is disappointing to see the NFL to acquiesce to the government's demands.
The reality is anyone who takes any action during the national anthem is making a statement, whether by choosing to stand or kneel. What makes America the country it is is everyone has the right to decide what statement they wish to make, and the government cannot stop that.
As the U.S. Supreme Court stated when considering the constitutionality of a law making the Pledge of Allegiance mandatory, “if there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”
Coerced displays of patriotism are not constitutional. We encourage everyone to consider the America it would be if this were otherwise.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
- 2Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 3Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 4Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 5Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250