Student Died in Pancake-Eating Contest. Now Her Family Is Suing Sacred Heart University
The family of a Sacred Heart University student who died after taking part in a pancake-eating contest is trying to bring awareness to the alleged dangers of such contests. It sued the university, claiming Sacred Heart is responsible for the March 2017 death of 20-year-old Caitlin Nelson.
October 30, 2018 at 12:40 PM
3 minute read
The mother of a 20-year-old Sacred Heart University student who died after taking part in a school-sanctioned pancake-eating contest in March 2017 has sued the university, arguing the contest was a “terribly dangerous idea.”
The lawsuit, which was filed Monday in Bridgeport Superior Court and seeks unspecified monetary damages, said Caitlin Nelson's death was “as foreseeable as it was horrific.” The 12-page lawsuit, which goes into lengthy detail about the hazards of having pancake-eating contests, said the aspiring social worker died when a glob of pancake paste filled her airway.
“Campus police officers responded and began frantically scooping pancake out of Caitlin's mouth in a futile attempt to save her life,” the lawsuit says. “These officers observed that Caitlin's mouth was compacted with pancakes, almost to her teeth, and the mass of pancake paste was like concrete.”
Nelson had planned to attend either Columbia, Fordham, or New York University after graduating from Sacred Heart, the second-largest Catholic university in New England. She died three days later from choking complications related to the incident, according to the complaint.
The lawsuit also said the 55-year-old university has provided no information on how and why the contest was approved, considering the alleged dangers associated with it.
“Today, a year and a half after Caitlin's death, her family is still waiting for answers,” the complaint states.
The court filing says that “only with transparency and accountability can future tragedies be avoided. This lawsuit seeks both.”
Kappa Delta, a school sorority, pitched the on-campus pancake-eating contest to the university, which approved it, the lawsuit said. Proceeds from the contest benefited the nonprofit Prevent Child Abuse America.
The lawsuit says Sacred Heart “should have known that an eating contest with college students participating posed an unreasonable risk of choking and death.” It goes on to say that the university's risk assessment of the contest was “unreasonable and inadequate.” And, the complaint says, the university failed to provide adequate medical personnel at the event.
Three attorneys from Bridgeport-based Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder represent Rosanne Nelson, Caitlin's mother, a New Jersey resident. Those attorneys, Katherine Mesner-Hage, Josh Koskoff and Alinor Sterling, all declined to comment.
But in a press release, Mesner-Hage wrote: “Caitlin's family is bringing this case to expose the dangers associated with amateur eating contests, and to help prevent other families from having to endure this type of preventable tragedy. These contests are significantly more dangerous than people realize.”
Michael Iannazzi, vice president for marketing and communications at the Fairfield-based university, declined to comment Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250