Judiciary Hearings: We All Deserve Better
We have, once again, seen some of our senior politicians engage in a sham process in order to achieve a political goal. They have shown themselves to be less than honorable men.
November 21, 2018 at 11:11 AM
5 minute read
To say the confirmation process for Judge, now Justice, Brett Kavanaugh was grueling is an understatement of gigantic proportions. There may be no one involved in any part of the process who is pleased with the way it was conducted. Even if you are pleased with the result, there can be no pleasure in the process.
The process is over now, and as Sen. Lisa Murkowski stated, it is time for healing. To what extent there can be healing is a difficult question.
For those of us who remember the Justice Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings, there is profound disappointment. Those hearings were and remain a huge embarrassment. Even those who were part of that spectacle, such as Sen. Joseph Biden, look back at it with regret. It could not be clearer that the process followed then never was fair, and the truth was never reached. The process was distorted to conceal the facts, and an honorable witness was unfairly discredited. Though the result is that Thomas is on the court, he is there with a perpetual cloud over his name. He deserved better, and so did those accusing him. And so did we.
It appears we have learned nothing in all these years. We are now faced with another justice who will likely serve on the court for many, many years, and will also do so with a cloud over his name. There was an opportunity to do the confirmation job better, and we missed that opportunity. Along the way, another credible, honorable witness testified and was ignored by those making the decisions. Worse than that, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's motives have been impugned, and she has been mocked by the president of the United States. We have not learned from the Thomas hearings. We have magnified the mistakes and hurt.
It does no good to recapitulate the many errors of the Kavanaugh hearings, but some attention should be paid to those protesting them. The prevalence of sexual assault is in the news every day now, ranging from celebrities to ordinary people to victims of predatory priests. Those protesting the Kavanaugh hearings—many of them victims of sexual assault themselves—were angry, loud, disruptive and challenging. Calling them out for that behavior just reinforces their injury and fails to understand their pain. That pain is very real, even if the assault happened years ago, as was evident from the very calm and cogent testimony of Ford.
The anger of victims that spills out into loud, angry confrontation is understandable. Note that Kavanaugh himself, when he said he felt unjustly accused, expressed his anger and pain forcefully and aggressively, yet his demeanor was found by various senators to be understandable and justifiable, even if an alarming display contrary to what is generally accepted judicial temperament.
The hearings we all just witnessed are, at base, a discouraging failure. Politics ruled, truth did not. The procedure could have been handled so much better, so much fairer. If it was to be a fair procedure, where the result would be a fair examination of the applicant, it should have been transparent. All his writings should have been produced for review. The identity of his accusers should have been made known as soon as possible, though their fear of revealing themselves was understandable then and is even more understandable now. But since there were accusers, time should have been devoted to the information they shared. An investigation should have been conducted fairly and without restraint, rather than a superficial sop that proved nothing.
Rather than treat a witness with a veneer of respect while doing everything to denigrate her story, her story should have been given the dignity of a real investigation. And under no circumstances should she or anyone else involved in a fair process be ridiculed by the president. He, in fact, should be censured for his crude and unfair remarks about her.
The result is that we have a new justice on the Supreme Court, but we are all sullied by the process of getting him there, including the court itself. We have learned nothing, unless it is a lesson in how to hold a hearing even less fair and less thorough than the Thomas hearings. Kavanaugh deserved better. His name was not cleared, it was clothed in a smokescreen. He, just like Thomas, will serve with a permanent cloud over his head his whole time on the Supreme Court. And certainly Ford deserved better. Serious harm has been done to her and her family, when all she was trying to do is to contribute to what she could only hope would be a fair process. And we all deserved better. We have, once again, seen some of our senior politicians engage in a sham process in order to achieve a political goal. They have shown themselves to be less than honorable men.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250