Why Female Litigators Leave Big Law—And What Could Get Them to Stay
The Connecticut Law Tribune spoke to three successful women attorneys and asked them about the obstacles women in law face, the successes they've had, and what still needs to be done.
November 26, 2018 at 12:48 PM
6 minute read
The big picture in Big Law was drastically different 30 years ago when women were paid much less than men, had very few positions of power and—in some cases—would walk into a room and be mistaken for the court reporter.
Those days are fading, female lawyers say, but inequities in pay, power and prestige in many of the largest law firms still exist. Several female attorneys who have made the climb to partner tell the Connecticut Law Tribune that there have been strides, but they say much more still needs to be done to smash through the glass ceiling.
The issue of gender equality in the legal profession has been a career-long mission for Greenberg Traurig's Hilarie Bass, the Miami-based attorney who has been with Greenberg for 37 years, including the past six as its co-president.
Bass is so passionate about women achieving equity and equality in Big Law that she's leaving the firm next month to work full-time for diversity and inclusion. She will work with law firms to ensure women achieve the respect, power and compensation they deserve—on par with their male counterparts.
She and other high-powered female attorneys told the Connecticut Law Tribune that mentorship and sponsorship are vital. They also agreed the issue of implicit bias must be addressed head-on, but they disagreed to some extent on the progress female attorneys have made over the past few decades.
Angeline Ioannou, co-managing partner of the Hartford office of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, for instance, seemed pleased with the overall trend during her 18-year career.
“I see a lot of women in powerful positions in Connecticut, myself included,” she said. “It is definitely increasing since I started. I think law firms, like mine, are recognizing that they need to retain their female talent more than ever. A lot of our clients are women, such as in health care, and they want to hire women attorneys.”
Bass, though, said: ”After 37 years in Big Law, I was shocked to realize how little progress we've made. It's important to me, personally, to know that 30 years from now we are not having the same conversation.”
It's also important to note that pay and partner inequities are not exclusive to Big Law, Bass said.
“These problems are common in any male-dominated profession,” Bass said.
Past president of the American Bar Association, Bass said she did significant research on topics important to women in law.
One interesting fact: dwindling numbers as women advance in law.
“We found that women start their first job in equal numbers with men, but by age 50 almost half of the women have left,” Bass said. “One of the things women complain about is inherent, complicit bias in elevations and compensation. Every study shows that there is a 20 cents per dollar pay gap between men and women in law and the firm's minority women pay gap is even greater.”
|'Unconscious Views'
If any progress is to be made, Bass said, the issue of implicit bias must be addressed.
Rhonda Tobin, a partner with Connecticut's powerhouse firm Robinson & Cole, echoed Bass in saying, “We are not seeing overt discrimination as we did in the past, but implicit bias has now become the focus. You need to make people aware of their unconscious views and sensitize people to think outside of the box. Law firms must look for ways we can do better and, when they find them, act.”
Tobin, who has been with Robinson & Cole for 28 years and is co-chair of the firm's litigation section and a member of its managing committee, said an example of implicit bias could entail “people unconsciously reaching out to work with people who are like them. They may not even realize what they are doing.”
Tobin and Ioannou agree implicit bias exists, even though the outright discrimination and comments have, for the most part, gone away.
Tobin said “I don't feel like I am being judged differently anymore because I am a woman. I just don't feel it.”
|Mistaken for the Court Reporter
Ioannou said she doesn't feel “patronized anymore. There was a lot of patronizing 20 years ago. I can recall being asked what I did and when I said, 'a lawyer,' I would get patronizing responses.”
When she was starting out as a new lawyer, Ioannou said, she'd be mistaken for the court reporter. And it happened more than once.
“I consider it progress that those comments do not occur anymore and that society has evolved,” she said. “We have not broken the glass ceiling, but we have a lot of cracks in it. We are getting there.”
Retaining and sponsoring women is a major focus in Big Law today, female leaders said.
“The key to retaining women is that younger female attorneys need to see a path to success,” Tobin said. “More junior women need to look up and see women that have made it. It's harder to see a path to success if you can't see someone who looks like you doing the job. They want to look up and see women partners. They want to look up and see women leaders, and they want to look up and see women who are business generators.”
Robinson & Cole, Tobin said, offers a lunch-and-learn series where successful women speak on how they excelled.
While mentoring has and continues to be an important part of most law firms, Tobin said the future lies in a different type of support.
“Sponsorship is someone who has a direct role in advocating for you when you are not in the room,” she said. “It might be advocating for you to work on a big case, and it might be advocating for you to be involved in a client pitch. It could also be advocating that you assume a leadership post in the firm or, ultimately, become partner.”
Noting that for the first time ever, more women graduated law school than men in 2018, Tobin believes there is more light at the end of the tunnel for female attorneys in Big Law.
“The future is bright,” she said. “If more than 50 percent of the people coming out of law school are women, that will ensure there will be a better pool of talent to promote down the road.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConnecticut Movers: New Hires at SkiberLaw, Verrill and Silver Golub & Teitell
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250