20 Connecticut Denny's Hit With Lawsuit Over Servers' Minimum Wage
An attorney for Denny's restaurant server Valarie Nettleton says the Madison resident is due thousands of dollars for working non-service duties and allegedly not being compensated for it. Nettleton's prospective class action covers about 20 Denny's in the state.
November 27, 2018 at 05:31 PM
3 minute read
A prospective wage employment class action lawsuit has been filed against about 20 Denny's restaurants in Connecticut for allegedly failing to pay its servers at least the minimum wage for non-service-related duties.
The lawsuit, which was filed Nov. 19 on behalf of current employee Valarie Nettleton, alleges C&L Diners LLC—owners of most of the state's Denny's franchises—routinely failed to separate its servers' non-service and service duties. The complaint alleges the 48-year-old Nettleton, who began working at the Westbrook Denny's in November 2016, would be assigned non-service work, usually prior to and after her shift, but also during her shift. The franchise, the complaint alleges, is in violation of the state's Minimum Wage Act.
While the law allows Connecticut eateries to pay servers the server minimum wage of $6.38 an hour, it requires them to pay the state's $10.10 minimum wage when employees are performing non-service duties and therefore not earning tips. Denny's repeatedly failed to comply, according to Michael Petela Jr., Nettleton's attorney.
“She has been underpaid by thousands of dollars,” said Petela, an associate with Hayber Law Firm in New Haven. Because plaintiff counsel have yet to receive wage records from the company, it's not clear how much Nettleton is owed, Petela told the Connecticut Law Tribune on Tuesday.
“There are two requirements that were not met that are pertinent to this lawsuit,” Petela said. “One of those is the tip requirement of segregating work. They did not do that. The second is the employer must obtain from the employee a statement stating their weekly wages that exceed the minimum wage. That also was not done.”
All of the servers and past servers in the approximate 20 Denny's franchises owned by C&L Diners in Connecticut who worked from Nov. 1, 2016, to the present are eligible to be part of the suit if it's classified as a class action. It's not clear how many people fit that category, but Petela said, “it's in the hundreds.”
Petela said he's confident the case, which was filed in New Haven Superior Court and has yet to be assigned a judge, will be victorious.
“We are optimistic because wage theft permeates throughout the restaurant industry,” Petela said. “Restaurants routinely ignore the tip credit requirements because it financially benefits them. In addition, servers lack the resources to enforce their rights and the Department of Labor lacks the resources to enforce the rights of all servers in the state. This affects some of the most economically vulnerable workers in the state.”
As of Tuesday afternoon, C&L Diners had not assigned an attorney to the case. The only named defendant in the lawsuit is Daniel Chu, managing member and owner of C&L. Chu, who is based in Canoga Park, California, did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Petela, who is seeking double damages plus attorney fees, said, “It will certainly be in the six figures based on the number of employees, if not the seven figures.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManaging Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
5 minute readConnecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
5 minute readGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250