Lawmakers Press FTC Over Matt Whitaker's Connection to Company Penalized for Fraud
“The staff has all the details. It's not a secret. They would be more than happy to provide a briefing,” FTC chair Joseph Simons said Tuesday at an oversight hearing in Washington.
November 27, 2018 at 06:32 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
U.S. Senate Democrats including Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal are demanding information from the Federal Trade Commission about any past entanglement with the acting U.S. attorney general, Matthew Whitaker, in connection with his past role as an adviser to a company the agency accused of scamming inventors out of millions of dollars.
During an oversight hearing Tuesday, FTC Chairman Joseph Simons committed to having his staff brief senators on the agency's investigation of World Patent Marketing, an invention promotion business that was shut down over agency claims that it bilked customers and intimidated those who complained about the company. World Patent Marketing reached a settlement with the FTC in May that included a nearly $26 million judgment against the company.
Whitaker's legal work in private practice has faced intense scrutiny since his rise to the top of the Justice Department following the ouster of Jeff Sessions. Six months after being finalized, the World Patent Marketing settlement has drawn significant attention. Whitaker, a former U.S. attorney in Iowa, served on the World Patent Marketing's advisory board and described the company in 2014 as a “first-class organization.”
Senator Blumenthal asked Simons Tuesday whether Whitaker had been subpoenaed by the FTC. Simons, noting that the World Patent Marketing settlement predated his tenure—the former Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner joined the agency last year—said he has not “studied what subpoenas have been issued in that case.”
“The staff has all the details. It's not a secret. They would be more than happy to provide a briefing,” Simons said.
Blumenthal cited media reporting that Whitaker allegedly once contacted a World Patent Marketing consumer to say there would be “serious civil and criminal consequences” if the past customer continued to post negative reviews about the company.
Simons said he was not personally aware of facts that would substantiate the report. ”My staff has the facts,” he said.
“You would agree with me, would you not, that that kind of statement would be improper?” Blumenthal asked.
“That's troubling,” Simons said.
Whitaker has previously denied knowing about any fraudulent activity at the company. In his financial disclosure, he reported receiving $1,875 in legal fees from World Patent Marketing in the run-up to his Justice Department tenure.
A Justice Department spokesperson was not immediately reached for comment Tuesday.
“Acting attorney general Matt Whitaker has said he was not aware of any fraudulent activity. Any stories suggesting otherwise are false,” a Justice Department spokesperson told The Washington Post earlier this month in a spotlight about Whitaker's ties to World Patent Marketing.
How long Whitaker will remain at the helm of Main Justice is unknown. President Trump hasn't nominated a permanent replacement, and new members of Congress take their seats in January.
Meanwhile, Whitaker's appointment as acting U.S. attorney general faces myriad court challenges. Challengers contend Whitaker, who was a chief of staff before being named acting attorney general, is unlawfully at the helm. The Justice Department issued a memo recently that concluded Whitaker's appointment was legal.
Whitaker, before joining the Justice Department, was a critic of the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, a probe he now oversees. As a paid contributor for CNN, he called for limiting the scope of the investigation and said the special counsel, Robert Mueller III, would be crossing a “red line” if his team probed the finances of Trump and his family. Whitaker received $15,000 in “consulting fees” for his CNN commentary, according to his financial disclosure.
Read more:
Matthew Whitaker's Financial Disclosures Show CNN, Consulting Income
Quotable Matt Whitaker: Nothing Sticks to Trump, 'Even Being a Misogynist'
Senate Democrats Sue Trump, Challenging Whitaker's Appointment at Main Justice
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPreparing for Change? These Leaders Have Already Done It. Plus, Managing Partner Survey Results
8 minute readFalse Claims Act Causation Standard Continues to Divide Federal Courts
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250