Lawsuits Claim Sexual Abuse Rampant at Former Deep River Day School for Troubled Boys
The lawsuits say two men at the school were known sexual predators and that the diocese should have been aware of their alleged behavior.
November 30, 2018 at 12:24 PM
4 minute read
Twenty lawsuits were filed against the Norwich Roman Catholic Diocese this week on behalf of several men who claim they were assaulted as boys at a day school for at-risk children.
The alleged abuse—which the lawsuit outline in explicit detail—occurred over the course of a decade and involved boys between the ages of 10 and 15. The alleged abuse was perpetrated at the former Academy of Mount St. John in Deep River by Christian brothers Paul McGlade and Pascal Alford, according to the lawsuit.
Both men have since died, but the lawsuits say the two were known sexual predators and that the diocese should have been aware of their alleged behavior. The residential facility had a clinical day school and was organized and operated by the diocese, according to the lawsuits.
The Congregation of Christian Brothers is a worldwide religious community within the Roman Catholic Church.
Both McGlade and Alford are from Australia. News reports indicate Alford was implicated in the sexual abuse of young boys in that country, too. According to a 2011 story in the Sydney Morning Herald, Alford and other Christian brothers were accused of the sexually assaulting children from the St. Augustine's Boys Home in Geelong, Australia. Alford died in 2004.
The lawsuits, which were filed in New London Superior Court by Hartford attorney Patrick Tomasiewicz of Fazzano & Tomasiewicz, says McGlade was involved in fellatio, anal sex, masturbation and fondled many boys. The suit says Alford also abused boys but to a lesser extent that generally included fondling and groping. The lawsuits also state the men often told the boys that they'd be betraying the church and God by not submitting to the sexual abuse.
McGlade was the executive director at the facility, and Alford was a music teacher. Neither was a priest.
One lawsuit, Christopher Doe v. The Norwich Roman Catholic Diocese, details the sexual assault of a 14-year-old boy in 1991 and 1992 by McGlade.
The suit states that, as the boy was preparing the chapel for service, McGlade began to discuss masturbation with the boy.
“During the discussion and preparing of the chapel, Brother Paul approached the plaintiff and began to fondle the plaintiff's genitals, asking the plaintiff how it felt,” according to the lawsuit. “While fondling the plaintiff's genitals, Brother Paul told the plaintiff that if the plaintiff betrayed the church, plaintiff would have a successful life. Brother Paul then began to masturbate the plaintiff, and for several minutes, at which point he released the plaintiff.”
Brother Paul, the lawsuit said, also told the boy that a “betrayal by the plaintiff of the Lord or the Lord's servants would result in the plaintiff going to jail.”
Another lawsuit, Michael Doe v. The Norwich Roman Catholic Diocese, details sexual abuse allegedly committed by Alford.
“During this time period, while taking trumpet lessons, brother Pascal began touching the plaintiff's thigh area and moved his hand to the plaintiff's genitals,” according to the lawsuit. “Brother Pascal then began to fondle the plaintiff's genitals through the plaintiff's clothing.”
Tomasiewicz declined to discuss the lawsuits, other than to say additional lawsuits will be filed.
The suits seek an undetermined amount of compensatory and punitive damages.
All of the alleged victims are now 48 years old or younger. Plaintiffs in Connecticut are allowed to file civil lawsuits alleging sexual abuse as a minor up until their 48th birthday.
The diocese is represented by Brad Babbitt, a partner with Robinson & Cole. Babbitt did not respond to a request for comment Friday. No one from the diocese was available for comment at press time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readPlaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250