Dueling Medical Testimony Ends in $280,925 Car Crash Verdict
The defense attempted to show that plaintiff's neck injury was a pre-existing condition.
December 05, 2018 at 12:26 PM
3 minute read
A Hartford Superior Court jury awarded $280,925 to a Massachusetts man who suffered head, neck, back and rib injuries after his car was T-boned.
It took the six-person jury four hours on Nov. 30 to come back with its verdict in favor of 60-year-old Kenneth Gilbert. The four-day trial featured dueling medical experts who disputed the injuries to Gilbert's neck.
The crash occurred in May 2013 in Windsor Locks when Victoria Pietrzak made a left-hand turn to enter a restaurant when she struck the driver's side of Gilbert's vehicle. Both cars were totaled and Pietrzak, a New York resident, was given a warning for failure to grant the right of way. A lawsuit was filed in April 2015.
Scott Stewart, Gilbert's Hartford-based attorney with McCoy & McCoy, said the jury heard from both Arpad Fejos, the doctor for the plaintiff, and Jonas Lieponis, a spinal surgery expert for the defense.
Lieponis told the jury that Gilbert's neck herniation “was pre-existing and not caused by the accident,” Stewart said. “We disputed that. Our expert said it was traumatic and causally related to the accident.”
“He continues to have injuries to his neck that radiate to the upper right extremities,” Stewart said. “He has done a wide range of treatment to his neck since the accident.”
Treatment includes steroid injections to ease Gilbert's pain and swelling, Stewart said.
Gilbert testified during trial, Stewart said. Pietrzak did not.
“My client testified to how the accident happened and how severe it was,” Stewart said. “He talked about how his neck injury has negatively affected his life.”
While Gilbert, who is an aircraft mechanic for Executive Jet, did not miss any work, Stewart said, “Any movements to his neck affect all activities of daily living,” he said.
Stewart used to be an insurance defense attorney for 15 years, including six and a half years with Allstate, who was Pietrzak's carrier.
“It feels good to be putting my skills to use in fighting for the injured, rather than the insurance company,” Stewart said.
Stewart said the defense's first and only offer was for $30,000. Stewart said Gilbert sought the full policy limit of $250,000.
David Yale of Simsbury-based Hassett & George, is representing the defense. Yale has not announced whether he plans to appeal. Yale did not respond to a request for comment.
In amended answers to the plaintiff's complaint, the defense wrote that it had insufficient knowledge of any injuries sustained by Gilbert and leaves it up to the plaintiff to show proof of injuries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Farcical': US Judge Threatens Rudy Giuliani With Contempt Over Lack of Asset Disclosure
Corporate Prosecutions 'Less Likely' Under Next Trump DOJ, Observers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 2'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 3The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 4Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 5In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250