Federal Judge Hikes Punitive Damages in Cigarette Case for Total $52.3 Million Award
A federal judge Thursday upped the amount of punitive damages R.J. Reynolds Tobacco must pay a woman who smoked one of its cigarette brands for more than 25 years. U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill sided with plaintiff Barbara Izzarelli, but the tobacco company is expected to appeal.
December 14, 2018 at 01:16 PM
5 minute read
The monetary award for a former Norwich resident who smoked Salem cigarettes for more than 25 years before ending up with a dozen surgeries to her larynx and esophagus is now up to $52.3 million.
On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill announced he was awarding $8 million in punitive damages to Barbara Izzarelli, who began smoking when she was 12 years old. Underhill also announced that the interest on the offer of judgment, now called an offer of compromise, which increased to 12 percent per year since the December 1999 lawsuit was filed, was at $36.43 million. All told, the offer-of-judgment interest, the new punitive damages award and the existing $7.98 million in compensatory damages bring the total award to $52.3 million.
David Golub, the Stamford-based attorney with Silver Golub & Teitell who is representing Izzarelli, told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday that his client has yet to receive a penny and that he expects R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., the parent company of Salem, to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City. The tobacco giant has until Jan. 12 to do so. Golub, though, said he expects the long drawn-out litigation to come to an end in 2019, which would mark the 20th year since the products liability lawsuit was originally filed in Connecticut.
A May 2010 federal jury awarded Izzarelli $7.9 million. At the time Underhill, who also presided over that trial, awarded punitive damages of $3.9 million and prejudgment interest increased the total judgment to $28.1 million. R.J. Reynolds appealed the jury award and Golub appealed the amount of punitive damages Underhill had awarded.
The case has gone through several courts since the jury announced its verdict. Most notably, the U.S. Supreme Court about a year ago refused to review the decision by the Second Circuit, thereby letting the $28.1 million jury verdict stand. That meant the case would then go back to Underhill, who would rule on the punitive damages.
Underhill by law could give upward of $15.96 million in punitive damages, or twice what was awarded in compensatory damages. Golub was seeking that amount, but as Underhill slammed the tobacco maker, the judge ended up awarding $8 million.
In his Thursday ruling, Underhill referred to the actions of R.J. Reynolds as “reprehensible” three times.
“The evidence at trial, as summarized in my ruling in Reynolds' post-verdict motions, indicate that Reynolds' conduct was highly reprehensible. Salem were extremely carcinogenic and addictive, and were intentionally manufactured that way,” Underhill wrote. “Reynolds knew that the product was harmful to smokers but continued to sell the cigarettes despite such knowledge; and consumers were actively misled about the health risks.”
In its defense, the tobacco giant claimed it did nothing wrong and that Izzarelli chose to smoke, albeit at 12 years old, by her own free will. Izzarelli, her attorney said, smoked heavily every day for more than 20 years. The jury agreed that Izzarelli, who now lives in Holly Hill, Florida, had culpability and held her 42 percent responsible for her own health woes. R.J. Reynolds was found to be 58 percent responsible.
R.J. Reynolds is represented by Mark Belasic of the Cleveland offices of Jones Day. Belasic did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
But the plaintiff's side applauded the outcome.
“Reynolds' defense is that they did nothing wrong,” Golub said. “Well, there is a $52.3 million judgment that says they did do something wrong.”
Golub continued: “It's important for everyone to understand that Reynolds deliberately preyed on kids. The evidence is that they intentionally made cigarettes more attractive to kids and manipulated the nicotine in the cigarettes to enhance the addictiveness.”
Golub said Izzarelli, 58, developed larynx cancer 22 years ago. A year later, he said, she underwent a total laryngectomy, followed by radiation and chemotherapy treatments. Today, she can no longer breathe through her mouth or nose and instead uses a tube in her throat.
Golub communicated with Izzarelli Thursday. ”She is very excited, very happy with the judge's ruling,” he said of his client. “Of course, she asked me if I thought it will be over soon, I said, 'Yes, Barbara. I think we can get it over sometime within the next year.”'
Golub was assisted on the case by colleagues Jonathan Levine and Marilyn Ramos.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Battle of the Experts': Bridgeport Jury Awards Defense Verdict to Stamford Hospital
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readJudge Awards Over $350K in Attorney Fees in Data Breach Class Action Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250