Connecticut AG Sues Purdue Pharma, Top Leadership Over Opioid Crisis
Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen has announced that his office will be pursuing a lawsuit against Purdue Pharma and many of its top executives regarding the drug company's marketing of opioid products.
December 20, 2018 at 04:56 PM
4 minute read
In one of his last actions as Connecticut attorney general, George Jepsen announced Thursday afternoon that his office would be filing another lawsuit against Big Pharma. This one, though, targets only Stamford-based Purdue Pharma and names 16 current and past top officials, including board members and former CEOs, as defendants.
The lawsuit, to be filed in Hartford Superior Court, claims the company designed, financed and wages an aggressive campaign to mislead doctors and patients of the addictions associated with opioids. The 30-page lawsuit says Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, “misinformed patients and doctors into prescribing, and patients into taking, higher and more dangerous doses” and that the company “convinced doctors to prescribe longer-duration opioid prescriptions and [for] patients to stay on Purdue's drugs for longer and more harmful periods of time.”
The lawsuit lays out an alleged elaborate scheme whereby Purdue Pharma sales representatives would mislead health providers about the company's products.
Those sales representatives, the lawsuit alleges, would, among other things, falsely tell prescribers that OxyContin was more difficult to abuse intravenously than generic oxycodine.
The lawsuit said money was the underlying factor for why Purdue Pharma allegedly falsely marketed its products.
“The defendants trained Purdue's sales representatives that increasing a patient's dose was a key move when making sales. For patients, taking higher doses of opioids increases the risk of addiction and death, but for the defendants, higher doses means higher profits,” the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit continues: “From the top, Purdue's leaders pushed employees to get more patients on opioids, at higher doses, for longer periods of time. The defendants awarded bonuses and prizes to sales representatives who generated the most opioid prescriptions.” In addition to OxyContin, Purdue also manufactures two other opioid medications: Hysingla and Butrans.
In a statement, Jepsen, who will leave office in three weeks, wrote that the drug company “has not demonstrated to me that it is serious about addressing the states' very real allegations of misconduct and coming to a meaningful settlement. It is my hope that, in filing this lawsuit at this time, Connecticut can assist in the collective effort to hold this company and responsible individuals accountable.”
In a statement emailed to the Connecticut Law Tribune from Purdue Pharma's media department Thursday, the company said: “We share the state's concern about the opioid crisis. While Purdue Pharma's opioid medicines account for less than 2 [percent] of total prescriptions, we will continue to work collaboratively with the state toward bringing meaningful solutions to address this public health challenge.”
The company's statement continues: “We vigorously deny the state's allegations. The state claims Purdue acted improperly by communicating with prescribers about scientific and medical information that the FDA [Federal Drug Administration] has expressly considered and continues to approve. We believe it is inappropriate for the state to substitute its judgment for the judgment of the regulatory, scientific and medical experts at FDA. We look forward to the opportunity to present our substantial defenses.”
The lawsuit alleges four counts of violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. It seeks damages, civil penalties and restitution as well as permanent injunctive relief.
According to the Attorney General's Office, 1,038 people died of accidental drug overdoses in 2017 with the vast majority being from opioid-related overdoses. The Connecticut Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has projected that 1,030 people will die of overdoses in 2018. The estimated economic cost of the opioid epidemic in Connecticut, according to the Attorney General's Office, was $10.27 billion.
As of Thursday afternoon, Purdue Pharma had not assigned attorneys to represent it in the latest lawsuit.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWrongful-Death Case Against Adult Day Care Sparks Call for State Regulation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250