Wells Fargo to Pay $575 Million to Resolve Unfair Trade Practices Claims
On Friday, the 50 states and the District of Columbia announced they had reached a $575 million settlement with Wells Fargo over state consumer protection claims.
December 28, 2018 at 02:47 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys general for the 50 states and the District of Columbia announced a $575 million settlement Friday with Wells Fargo to resolve state consumer protection claims for unauthorized accounts and other alleged unfair trade practices.
Wells Fargo agreed to pay the settlement after the states said it violated laws by opening millions of unauthorized accounts and enrolled customers into online banking services without their knowledge or consent. It also improperly referred customers for enrollment in third-party renters and life insurance policies, charged auto loan customers for forced-placed and unnecessary collateral protection insurance, and incorrectly charged customers for mortgage rate lock extension fees, among misdeeds, according to the states.
Here's How Much Wells Fargo Will Pay
- California – $148.73M
- Connecticut – $5.24M
- District of Columbia – $1.1M
- Delaware – $2M
- Florida – $28.3M
- Georgia – $16.35M
- New Jersey – $16.99M
- New York – $11.85M
- Pennsylvania – $16.53M
- Texas – $47.38M
“Wells Fargo customers entrusted their bank with their livelihood, their dreams, and their savings for the future,” said California Attorney General Xavier Becerra. “Instead of safeguarding its customers, Wells Fargo exploited them, signing them up for products—from bank accounts to insurance—that they never wanted. This is an incredible breach of trust that threatens not only the customers who depended on Wells Fargo, but confidence in our banking system. As our investigation found, Wells Fargo's conduct was unlawful and disgraceful.” California will get the most from the settlement, receiving $148.7 million.
In Connecticut, which will receive $5.2 million, outgoing Attorney General George Jepsen said, ”Wells Fargo engaged in conduct that violated the public's trust and ran afoul of state laws.”
Wells Fargo has acknowledged opening millions of deposit, credit card and other accounts, and conducting transfers of funds without customer authorization over various periods from 2002 through 2017.
“This settlement holds Wells Fargo accountable for its widespread victimization of its customers through unfair and deceptive trade practices,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said. “My office will continue to do what's necessary to protect consumers and the integrity of our banks and financial institutions.”
The bank acknowledges “misbehavior,” according to California's attorney general. It opened more than 3.5 million unauthorized accounts, enrolled 528,000 customers in online bill pay based on improper sales practices, and provided renter and life-insurance policies its customers never authorized. From 2005 to 2016, Wells Fargo added collateral protection insurance or delayed cancellation of such insurance on millions of auto loans.
In an emailed statement Friday, the company's chief executive officer and president Tim Sloan said: “This agreement underscores our serious commitment to making things right in regard to past issues as we work to build a better bank.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Upholds $5M Judgment Against Trump in E. Jean Carroll Case
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
- 2New York Environmental Legislation in 2024
- 3Cravath Hires Paul Weiss Antitrust Co-Chair
- 4Contract Technology Provider LegalOn Launches AI-powered Playbook Tool
- 5Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250