Connecticut-Led States' Settlement Wipes Out $494M in Student Debt
Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia announced a settlement agreement Thursday with Career Education Corp. that will put nearly $494 million back into the pockets of students.
January 03, 2019 at 04:55 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Connecticut has helped score a nationwide settlement that eliminates nearly half a billion dollars in student debt.
A settlement agreement announced Thursday requires Illinois-based Career Education Corporation to change its enrollment practices and forgo collection of $493.7 million in debt owed by 179,529 students nationally.
States leading a five-year investigation into Career Education Corporation's business practices included Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri and Oregon. Every state in the nation, with the exception of New York and California, signed onto the settlement.
The investigation, the states said, was launched after complaints from students of predatory and deceptive practices. There was also a critical report on the for-profit education sector by the U.S. Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Career Education operates many brick-and-mortar schools across the country, including American InterContinental University, Colorado Technical University and Briarcliffe College.
Outgoing Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen applauded the settlement, which comes days before the end of his term.
“For far too long, unscrupulous for-profit colleges have put money before people, engaged in deceptive recruiting practices, and left students with a burden of crushing debt while providing them with useless degrees that wouldn't lead them to gainful employment,” Jepsen said in a statement. “Today, we are holding Career Education Corp. responsible for the misrepresentations it made to these students. It is my hope that this debt relief will help ease the burden on students who were trying to better themselves, their careers and their livelihoods but were instead tricked into programs and degrees that were sometimes worthless.”
About 1,415 Connecticut residents have been granted $6.8 million in student debt relief. In Pennsylvania, 12,600 students received $38.6 million in education debt relief and in New Jersey, some 6,400 eligible students were relieved of $19.6 million in debt. State attorneys general allege in the settlement agreement that Career Education Corp. used deceptive practices to enroll students in programs that did not live up to the company's promises. Educational programs offered by the company allegedly lacked proper accreditation, and job placement rates were exaggerated, convincing students who otherwise would not have enrolled to sign up.
The company denies wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a statement: “Career Education Corp. was among the companies that put its own profits ahead of its students' best interests. Today's settlement helps right that wrong by securing debt relief for thousands of New Jersey residents who attended Career Education Corp. schools.”
A statement on the Career Education Corp's website called the resolution “an important milestone for the company that coincides with the completion last month of a multi-year process of teaching out and closing our transitional campuses.” Chief Executive Officer Todd Nelson stated “We have remained steadfast in our belief that we can work with the attorneys general to demonstrate the quality of our institutions and our commitment to students.”
The states found, according to Jepsen, that Career Education used emotionally charged language to pressure students into enrolling in CEC schools and deceived students about the total costs of enrollment. Admissions representatives were instructed to inform prospective students only about the cost per credit hour without disclosing the total number of required credit hours.
The agreement also calls on the company to, among other things, cease enrolling students in programs that do not lead to state licensure in professions that require licenses for employment. It also requires Career Education to establish a risk-free trial period for undergraduate students.
Under the settlement, state attorneys general release CEC from any and all civil claims related to the alleged misconduct.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250