Task Force Recommends No Special State Courts for Opioid Addicts
A state task force formed to look at the opioid crisis has recommended using services already in place, instead of creating a special state court for people addicted to opioids.
January 03, 2019 at 04:40 PM
4 minute read
A 14-member task force composed of judges, attorneys and health officials have recommended not creating special state courts for defendants addicted to opioids. It instead recommended focusing on treatment plans already in place in Connecticut.
The task force, which released its 73-page report to the state Judiciary Committee on Jan. 1, opted against mirroring Buffalo, New York, which established the country's first-ever opioid intervention court in May 2017. That court was funded, in part, by a three-year, $300,000 federal grant.
Task force members told the Connecticut Law Tribune Thursday they made recommendations based on cost and other options, such as the Treatment Pathway Program, already in place.
In addition, members said, the Buffalo example is a drain on resources.
“In Buffalo, people appear in court every single day, five days a week. It is quite a tremendous allocation of resources,” said Robert Devlin Jr., assistant administrative judge and a member of the task force. “Even the judge in Buffalo, who advocated it, said it's a resource-intensive approach and a very expensive program.” In Buffalo, Devlin said, “They come to court everyday to monitor their adherence to their plan for overcoming drug addiction.” It's not clear how much it costs Buffalo to operate its two drug courts, including one devoted solely to opioids.
Task force members said they believe the opioid crisis should be looked at as a public health concern, not a criminal justice issue.
“Opioids are a serious problem in our state,” Devlin said. “We are open to looking at this from the lens of public health. What are the public health resources?”
Task force member Timothy Fisher, dean and professor of law at the University of Connecticut School of Law, said, “Every court in Connecticut is an opioid court, to some degree. The best court, though, for many people suffering addiction is no court at all. Putting someone in jail does not address the addiction or the cure or the causes. It's just ruining more lives a little bit more.”
The task force report has many recommendations. The No. 1 priority, the report said, is to expand the Treatment Pathway Program statewide. TPP was piloted in 2015 at Bridgeport Superior Court with a $100,000 grant from the Public Welfare Foundation.
The grant supported, among other things, a licensed clinical social worker who is housed in the courthouse. The TPP operates in Bridgeport, New London, Torrington and Waterbury. It costs $100,000 for the program in each location. More than 400 people have been served by TPP and those in the program are released from state custody to receive treatment. Expanding TPP, the task force notes, would cost $1.8 million and would take 12 months to roll out.
Other task force recommendations include providing funding to the Division of Public Defender Services for two additional social workers, and contracting for an additional 123 residential beds, at around $7 million, for defendants not eligible for TPP.
The TPP program, which is voluntary, has been a successful one, Chief Public Defender Christine Rapillo told the Connecticut Law Tribune.
“The best option is to get out of the court system and into a program, and the TPP is a good program,” Rapillo said. For those who are not eligible for TPP, Rapillo said, “Social workers from my office are in all 33 courthouses in the state. Those social workers will assess a client and figure out what they need for treatment. The social workers can then get people evaluated and target them into the right programs.”
Rapillo added: “We will not solve the problem by locking people up.”
According to the office of the chief medical examiner, more than 1,000 people in Connecticut died from accidental drug overdoses in 2017. The 2018 numbers are not yet available.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Filings Surged in First Half of 2024 Amid Uptick in Big Chapter 11 Cases
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250