The Capital Case That Generated the 'Chip Smith' Instruction
Few are aware of the role that Father Michael McGivney, founder of the Knights of Columbus, played in that case.
January 03, 2019 at 04:11 PM
3 minute read
|
Few, if any, names are as well-known in the annals of Connecticut jurisprudence as that of James “Chip” Smith. Even those practitioners who never venture into the bowels of the criminal courts are aware of his name and the seminal holding of the Connecticut Supreme Court regarding instructions to the jury on the deliberative process. Fewer are aware of the role that Father Michael McGivney, founder of the Knights of Columbus, played in that case.
On the evening of Dec. 28, 1880, Smith, in a drunken state, got into a physical confrontation with Ansonia Police Chief Daniel J. Hayes on that town's Main Street. Smith's father had heard that his son was in possession of a pistol and asked Hayes to take his son into custody.
Ironically, Smith had been out drinking that evening with the brother of Hayes. A struggle ensued and Hayes was mortally wounded. Smith was arrested and charged with murder. Among the claims at trial, Smith contended that the fatal wound was from Hayes' own weapon not Smith's gun. After a high-publicity trial in New Haven, Smith was convicted of murder in the first degree in April 1881 and sentenced to die.
McGivney, a parish priest assigned to St. Mary's Parish on Hillhouse Avenue in New Haven, was no stranger to the New Haven jail. He regularly offered support to those imprisoned. He took a particular interest in Smith and extensively counseled him during his incarceration. Smith publicly acknowledged in a press report the efforts of McGivney and Smith's respect for him.
The appeal of Smith's conviction was decided by the Connecticut Supreme Court in December 1881. In affirming the conviction, the court approved a jury instruction given by the trial court which, inter alia, instructed those jurors in the minority position to reconsider their view in light of the views of their majority fellow jurors. Since that day, that instruction, which was somewhat modified by the Supreme Court in 2002, has been known as the “Chip Smith” charge. It is frequently employed when a jury reports it is deadlocked in deliberations.
Smith's execution was set for Sept. 1, 1882. Efforts to save his life by his counsel, including an appeal for clemency to the governor, would be to no avail. McGivney was a daily visitor to Smith during the course of that summer, ministering to his needs. As the date of execution approached, McGivney spent most of his days with the prisoner, who appeared to many to have undergone a dramatic beneficial change in his heretofore surly attitude and had adopted a calm acceptance of his impending fate.
After celebrating mass, Chip Smith and McGivney walked to the gallows together. At 10:30 a.m. on the morning of Friday, Sept. 1, 1882, Smith was executed. In bequeathing his simple possessions, Smith chose to leave the priest a plant which at the time of Smith's death was blooming in his cell.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Stormy Daniels 'Hush Money' Trial: Donald Trump Should Be Very Worried
7 minute readShining a Light on Opposing Hate: The Palestinian Protesters Who Defended New Haven's Menorah
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250