Swastika Allegedly Drawn at Workstation Leads to Discrimination Suit Against NAES Corp.
A federal lawsuit has been filed against NAES Corp., alleging blatant and ongoing racism by one supervisor at its water-processing facility in Hartford.
January 04, 2019 at 01:31 PM
4 minute read
A former employee of a Hartford-based waste-processing facility has sued the company, claiming his supervisor made repeated racist comments and even painted a swastika in his work space.
In the lawsuit, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport, Michael Brockman, who is black, alleged the harassment and bigoted comments were so bad that he resigned after nine months on the job because the company failed to protect him from the abusive behavior.
The lawsuit details several incidents in which the 48-year-old Brockman, who worked for NAES Corp. as a loader operator, was allegedly repeatedly berated by Brendan O'Connor, his supervisor, who is white.
O'Connor declined to discuss the lawsuit with the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday.
As of Friday afternoon, NAES had not named an attorney to represent it in the lawsuit. David Miner, associate general counsel for the company's headquarters in Issaquah, Washington, did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
The alleged conduct began in September 2017, a week after Brockman began working at NAES. The lawsuit claims the two men were in a confined entry area at the facility when Brockman commented the entrance looked tight. In response, O'Connor said, “I bet you'd go in there if there were fried chicken and watermelon inside,” the lawsuit claims. The comments allegedly continued throughout the fall, the lawsuit says. Among other things, O'Connor is alleged to have said things such as Brockman had a “baby mama,” that people in Florida “don't like your kind,” and allegedly asked Brockman if he was a drug dealer because he had two cellphones.
Management and human resources, the lawsuit says, did nothing to help Brockman. Human resources, the lawsuit says, claimed it did its own investigation into the alleged incidents and found O'Connor, who still works for the company, did nothing wrong.
In March, the lawsuit says, Brockman reported O'Connor to NAES's corporate hotline in Washington state. Two days later, the lawsuit says, O'Connor apologized for making offensive comments. But Brockman's attorneys told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday that the incident that stood out for Brockman was the swastika painted on a wall in green paint in an area where the plaintiff frequently worked. The swastika was painted the same day O'Connor allegedly apologized.
“Brockman believed that O'Connor was responsible for the swastika because he had observed O'Connor at the paint cabinet with a spray can of green paint earlier that day,” Raymond Dinsmore, one of Brockman's two attorneys, told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “Mr. Brockman believed that the swastika was communicating to him that he would not be successful in his efforts to seek justice through the company.”
A second notable incident, Dinsmore said, was that the company reneged on an offer to transfer Brockman to another position where he wouldn't have to report to O'Connor. Brockman is now working as a third-shift box truck driver at another company.
Dinsmore, of counsel with the Hayber Law Firm, said he believes O'Connor had spoken in derogatory terms to other employees.
The lawsuit, which claims violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, seeks an undetermined amount of compensatory and punitive damages. It also seeks back pay and lost benefits, or reinstatement of front pay.
The lawsuit cites six counts, including retaliation in violation of Title VII and retaliation in violation of the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act.
Assisting Dinsmore in the case is Deborah McKenna of the Hayber Law Firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Sinks Goodwin's Request for New Trial After Jury Sides With Boston Police in Wrongful-Death Suit
6 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1Walmart Accused of Misrepresenting 'Cheese' Ingredients in Great Value's Macaroni & Cheese
- 2Manhattan Lawyers' Group Prepares to Challenge Trump’s Plan for Mass Deportations
- 3Deal Watch: Simpson, Freshfields, Wachtell Lead Big Deals as SPACs, IPOs Crank Up
- 4In Mafia Case, Justices Ponder: Is Murder Always Violent?
- 5In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250