Federal Judge Dismisses Part of Sex Assault Suit Against Indian Mountain School
The Indian Mountain School has been hit with several lawsuits claiming a former English teacher sexually abused young boys decades ago. On Thursday, a federal judge ruled that some of claims in the latest lawsuit, specifically dealing with intentional infliction of emotional distress, would be dismissed.
January 18, 2019 at 01:20 PM
4 minute read
A private boarding school facing multiple lawsuits alleging sexual abuse by a former English teacher was given a partial victory Thursday when a federal judge granted its motion to dismiss claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress in one of those cases.
Ramsey Gourd's lawsuit against Lakeville-based Indian Mountain School will now proceed, with surviving claims alleging negligence, recklessness and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Gourd claimed he was sexually assaulted by Christopher Simonds from 1977-1980, beginning when he was 12 years old. Simonds has since died.
Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder attorneys, who represent Gourd and other students accusing Simonds, reached confidential settlements on behalf of three former students of Simonds.
But in her seven-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Janet Bond Arterton said the plaintiff could not meet the high legal standards needed to show intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Arterton wrote that in order to establish intentional infliction of emotional distress, plaintiffs must prove “the actor intended to inflict emotional distress, or that he knew or should have known that emotional distress was a likely result of his conduct.”
The case comes down to what top school officials knew about Simonds' purported interest in young boys, and when they knew it. Arterton noted William Cuddy, then-chairman of the board of the school, had information from the school nurse at the time that the teacher possessed child pornography and was always touching and hugging students. The school, in court filings, argued that the plaintiffs did not allege sufficient facts to establish that the school's board knew of Simonds' predilections either before or during Gourd's time at Indian Mountain.
The judge found, “These facts, if proved to be known by Cuddy, fail to meet the heightened standard of plausibly showing that Cuddy's failure to take action regarding Simonds could establish the board's intentional failure to act, or that the board knew or should have known that its inaction would likely result in extreme emotional distress. Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss will be granted.”
There is no statute of limitations in Connecticut to pursue civil sexual assault claims. Criminal charges were never filed. Gourd, who now lives in Vermont, claims in the April lawsuit that Simonds took advantage of his role as a teacher to have sex with young boys. Those boys, the lawsuit said, were known as Simonds' “boys” or “pets.”
Simonds, the lawsuit alleges, gave Gourd and other boys marijuana, cigarettes, alcohol, LSD and cocaine. The former teacher, who taught at the school from 1973 until he resigned in 1985, also allegedly showed the boys pornography, and took photographs of them to blackmail them into silence.
The lawsuit alleges that school staff, including then-headmaster Peter Carleton, knew of the abuse but did nothing to stop it.
Plaintiff's counsel, Antonio Ponvert III of Koskoff, did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Robinson & Cole's Brad Babbitt, Kathleen Dion and Jeffrey White represent the school. White did not respond to a request for comment, while Dion referred all inquiries to Babbitt, who declined to comment.
Indian Mountain's director of communications, Ally Morrissey, also did not respond to a request for comment.
The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250