7 Connecticut Attorneys Disciplined, Grievance Committee Reports
Charges against the attorneys included trust-account violations and failure to provide diligent representation.
February 01, 2019 at 06:54 PM
4 minute read
|
The Statewide Grievance Committee announced disciplinary action against seven attorneys, including presentment, reprimands and suspensions.
It also reinstated two attorneys, effective immediately: Guarika Anand of Concord, Massachusetts, and Tamara Evanko of Vernon. Anand was suspended for one year for failing to deposit and safeguard funds in an escrow account, while Evanko had failed to cooperate with an audit of her trust account. Evanko had been on interim suspension since July 30.
Here's a look at attorneys whose ethic charges led to disciplinary action.
|Richard Aries
The Statewide Grievance Committee made a presentment in the case of South Windsor solo practitioner Richard Aries. The reviewing committee of the grievance committee found that Aries engaged in unethical conduct in connection with the representation of a man in a workers' compensation matter.
The committee found that Aries failed to take any action to get the complainant's bills paid in connection with the workers' compensation settlement agreement. In addition, the committee found that Aries failed to keep his client reasonably informed regarding the status of his case.
The presentment is pending a final decision by the Grievance Committee.
|Jeffrey Cedarfield:
The reviewing committee issued a reprimand to Hartford solo practitioner Jeffrey Cedarfield for engaging in unethical conduct in his representation of a client in a bankruptcy matter.
Cedarfield, the committee said, failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of her case and failed to return her telephone calls. In addition, the committee said, Cedarfield failed to file his disclosure of compensation document on time, allowing the woman's bankruptcy case to be dismissed. The committee also found that Cedarfield's $1,000 fee was unreasonable “in consideration of the legal service rendered.” The reprimand will remain on Cedarfield's record.
|Arik Fetscher:
The Grievance Committee made a presentment in the case of Cos Cob solo practitioner Arik Fetscher, finding he used abusive language toward several court personnel over the dismissal of a lawsuit involving his stepfather.
Its reviewing committee wrote that Fetscher “has no remorse for his actions.”
“He believes that profanity and obscenity are warranted when an attorney believes that an injustice is occurring,” the group wrote. “He would use profanity in the future if he believed it was warranted and that profanity can be effective advocacy.”
The presentment is pending a final decision by the Grievance Committee.
|Richard Gordon:
The group made a presentment in the case of Hartford solo practitioner Richard Gordon. Its reviewing committee concluded Gordon failed to provide his client with diligent representation by withdrawing an appeal, without her consent, in a wrongful termination case. The committee found that although Gordon presented a settlement proposal to the state, he never put it in writing and the parties never signed. The presentment is pending a final decision by the Grievance Committee.
|Peter McGuinness:
The Statewide Grievance Committee also reprimanded and set conditions for solo Fairfield attorney Peter McGuinness, charged with improper handling of his IOLTA account. IOLTA, or Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts, are pooled trust accounts for holding client funds.
McGuinness, under the rules of the reprimand, must attend in person and at his own expense, one continuing education course in IOLTA account management. The attorney must also comply with monthly audits of his IOLTA account for six months.
|Alan Steinmetz:
Acting on actions by the New York and New Jersey State bar associations, where Alan Steinmetz had been disciplined, Connecticut officials suspended Steinmetz from practicing law in the state for one year, effective Oct. 16, 2018.
Steinmetz's ethics cases stem from a New Jersey investigation into allegations the attorney misappropriated escrow funds from a client's real estate transaction.
|Michael Stratton:
West Haven attorney Michael Stratton has been placed on interim suspension, effective immediately.
The committee said Stratton failed to cooperate with an audit of his Wells Fargo IOLTA account, in violation of the rules governing attorney ethics.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250