DC Circuit Nominee Admits Some Writings at Yale Now Make Her 'Cringe'
Rao, facing questions from senators, said she has matured since writing the controversial columns on multiculturalism and sexual assault at Yale.
February 05, 2019 at 02:43 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Neomi Rao, the Trump administration's choice to fill the D.C. Circuit vacancy left by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, defended, and expressed some regret for, writings she penned in the 1990s that have come under scrutiny.
The nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit admitted during a Tuesday confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee that some of the language she used in those columns—expressing her views on campus multiculturalism, sexual assault and more—made her “cringe.”
“To be honest looking back at some of those writings and re-reading them, I cringe at some of the language I used,” Rao said Tuesday in an exchange with committee chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina. “I was young—it's over two decades ago now—but you know, I think I was responding to things that were happening on campus at that time.”
“In the intervening two decades, I like to think I have matured as a thinker, a writer and indeed as a person,” she said.
Rao's comments, which came in a hearing that lasted over two hours, marked the first time she's addressed the columns she wrote as a Yale undergraduate in the mid-1990s. The Alliance for Justice, a liberal group that has opposed Rao's nomination, said the pieces demonstrate her “hostility toward racial and gender equality, sexual assault survivors,” among other things.
Among the columns that have drawn the most controversy was an October 1994 piece where Rao, writing about an alleged date rape incident at Yale, suggested that a way for women to avoid “date rape is to stay reasonably sober.”
Rao said Tuesday that the column made it “very clear that rape is a terrible crime for which men should be held responsible.”
“No one should blame a victim of rape or sexual assault. I was trying to make, and perhaps not in the most elegant way, the sort of common-sense observation that excessive drinking can lead to risky and dangerous behavior for both men and women,” Rao said in an exchange with Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont.
Rao said she “certainly” regretted “any implication of blaming the victim.”
Rao currently serves as the head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a position often referred to as the White House regulatory czar. In that role, Rao has spearheaded the Trump administration's deregulatory agenda, including its “two-for-one” effort to cut two regulations for every new one introduced.
If confirmed by the Senate, Rao would ascend to a court widely considered the second highest in the nation, in part because it receives the bulk of cases challenging the federal government's actions.
Rao did not commit on Tuesday to recusing herself from matters she worked on at OIRA, but said she'd look carefully at statutory standards for recusal, consult with colleagues and follow precedents and practices on the D.C. Circuit.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary committee who initially pressed Rao on the issue of recusal, noted Trump's first nominee to the D.C. Circuit—Greg Katsas—committed to recusing himself from issues he worked on while serving as deputy counsel in the Trump White House.
Rao has served as the head of OIRA since her July 2017 confirmation. She's currently on leave from her role as director and founder of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School.
The American Bar Association's standing committee on judicial nominations rated Rao “well qualified” on Monday.
Still, Rao faces intense opposition from liberal advocacy groups over her previous writings. They've also criticized her lack of judicial experience.
“Neomi Rao's record of offensive statements about women, sexual assault survivors, LGBTQ people, people of color and the environment is matched only by her track record of advancing federal government policies that are deeply harmful to these same communities and interests,” said Nan Aron, who heads the Alliance for Justice.
Rao said during Tuesday's hearing that she believed her academic and practical experience—including working in all three branches of the federal government—“relates very closely to the specialized docket of the D.C. Circuit.”
Rao's writings, particularly those criticizing multicultural groups on campuses, have drawn comparisons to the undergraduate columns written by Ryan Bounds, a withdrawn nominee to the Ninth Circuit. In one article, Bounds railed against “race-focused groups” on college campuses, and accused them of fostering what he described as “race-think.” His nomination was later withdrawn after Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, the lone black Republican in the Senate, and others, announced their opposition to Bounds' nomination.
If confirmed, Rao would become the second Trump administration official—after Katsas—to join the D.C. Circuit. She'd join a long list of former Justice Clarence Thomas clerks, including Katsas, nominated by Trump to the federal bench.
Rao clerked for Thomas from 2001 to 2002, following a clerkship with Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III on the Fourth Circuit from 1999 to 2000. Between her clerkships, she was counsel to the Senate judiciary panel.
She also served as an associate counsel at the George W. Bush White House from 2005 to 2006. She said Tuesday her role involved overseeing legal issues for agencies and working on judicial nominations.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everybody Is Holding Their Breath': Big Law Lobbying Businesses See Mixed Earnings in Q3
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250