Appellate Court Judge DiPentima Talks About Role, Early Days as Attorney
Chief Judge of the Connecticut Appellate Court Alexandra DiPentima spoke to the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday about her early aspirations as an attorney and why she enjoys being on the Connecticut Appellate Court.
February 08, 2019 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
Alexandra DiPentima realized in her senior year at Princeton University that she wanted to help people. What better way to do so than to be a Legal Aid lawyer?
So the Kent native took a year off after graduating with a degree in intellectual history to work at Johns Hopkins as a data collector for clinical field research. She then went on to get her law degree in 1979 from the University of Connecticut School of Law.
Her first job out of law school was her dream job. DiPentima joined Connecticut Legal Services, similar to Legal Aid, in 1979. It was a revelation, says DiPentima, now the 65-year-old chief judge of the Connecticut Appellate Court.
“It certainly opened my eyes to people who had all sorts of economic problems,” she said. “I represented a lot of low-economic individuals who were victims of domestic abuse and others who had housing issues. That work gave me an appreciation and opened my mind to people who I had not had any contact with before. These people were not so different from me. They just had unfortunate events in their lives. I continue to appreciate the need for Legal Aid, and also, 'There but for the grace of God, go I.'”
DiPentima said she thought she was set for a career as an attorney with Connecticut Legal Services, but this was the age of Ronald Reagan and that administration and the U.S. Congress cut back on funding and she got laid off after two years on the job. “I think I would have had a career in legal services, but I have no regrets on how my path turned out and where I am today,” she said.
DiPentima, the daughter of a longtime teacher at The Kent School, then went into private practice and in 1993 was appointed a Superior Court judge. Ten years later, in 2003, DiPentima was sworn in as a judge on the Connecticut Appellate Court and in 2010 became its chief judge.
Then Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice Chase Rogers appointed DiPentima as chief judge. Rogers, now a partner at Day Pitney, has known DiPentima since 2006.
“She does not take herself too seriously, but takes the job as chief judge very seriously,” Rogers told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday. “From my viewpoint, she is solution-oriented. I think she did an excellent job of managing the Appellate Court over the last eight years. She has a remarkable ability to deal directly with issues and work with people to solve problems in a very straightforward manner.”
One major goal: maintaining civility.
“I can make a difference in policy, and I really try to make this a collegial court, a collaborative court,” said DiPentima, who heads the Rules Advisory Committee with its co-chair, Connecticut Supreme Court Associate Justice Richard Palmer. “That means a lot to me,” she said.
That collegial tone is evident, said Connecticut Appellate Court Judge Christine Keller.
“We are the intermediate court and we really do not have inter-judge squabbles,” Keller said Friday. “We do not tend to have a high degree of personality conflicts and that's because she sets the tone and is very measured and considerate.”
The best part of being a judge, DiPentima said, is the ability to make a difference as part of a court that hears about 70 cases a term. during each of its eight terms. While the court will hear about 70 cases a term or 500 cases in a court year, each judge in the Appellate Court will hear about 18-20 cases a term.
“There is just an unbelievable amount of diversity and issues and facts that come before us,” she said. “The fact that I can be part of deciding the best resolution in a case is so rewarding. I'm grateful.”
In 2007, the then-chief judge appointed DiPentima chairwoman of the newly formed Public Services and Trust Commission, which created a five-year strategic plan for the judicial branch. That work is ongoing and DiPentima now oversees the implementation of the plan, dealing with human capital and addressing the needs of the workforce within the judicial branch.
Related Stories:
Long-Serving Justice Palmer, Often Seen as Swing Vote, Looks Back on His Tenure
Connecticut's New Chief Justice Richard Robinson Talks About His Historic Rise
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPreparing for Change? These Leaders Have Already Done It. Plus, Managing Partner Survey Results
8 minute readA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250