Appellate Court Judge DiPentima Talks About Role, Early Days as Attorney
Chief Judge of the Connecticut Appellate Court Alexandra DiPentima spoke to the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday about her early aspirations as an attorney and why she enjoys being on the Connecticut Appellate Court.
February 08, 2019 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
Alexandra DiPentima realized in her senior year at Princeton University that she wanted to help people. What better way to do so than to be a Legal Aid lawyer?
So the Kent native took a year off after graduating with a degree in intellectual history to work at Johns Hopkins as a data collector for clinical field research. She then went on to get her law degree in 1979 from the University of Connecticut School of Law.
Her first job out of law school was her dream job. DiPentima joined Connecticut Legal Services, similar to Legal Aid, in 1979. It was a revelation, says DiPentima, now the 65-year-old chief judge of the Connecticut Appellate Court.
“It certainly opened my eyes to people who had all sorts of economic problems,” she said. “I represented a lot of low-economic individuals who were victims of domestic abuse and others who had housing issues. That work gave me an appreciation and opened my mind to people who I had not had any contact with before. These people were not so different from me. They just had unfortunate events in their lives. I continue to appreciate the need for Legal Aid, and also, 'There but for the grace of God, go I.'”
DiPentima said she thought she was set for a career as an attorney with Connecticut Legal Services, but this was the age of Ronald Reagan and that administration and the U.S. Congress cut back on funding and she got laid off after two years on the job. “I think I would have had a career in legal services, but I have no regrets on how my path turned out and where I am today,” she said.
DiPentima, the daughter of a longtime teacher at The Kent School, then went into private practice and in 1993 was appointed a Superior Court judge. Ten years later, in 2003, DiPentima was sworn in as a judge on the Connecticut Appellate Court and in 2010 became its chief judge.
Then Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice Chase Rogers appointed DiPentima as chief judge. Rogers, now a partner at Day Pitney, has known DiPentima since 2006.
“She does not take herself too seriously, but takes the job as chief judge very seriously,” Rogers told the Connecticut Law Tribune Friday. “From my viewpoint, she is solution-oriented. I think she did an excellent job of managing the Appellate Court over the last eight years. She has a remarkable ability to deal directly with issues and work with people to solve problems in a very straightforward manner.”
One major goal: maintaining civility.
“I can make a difference in policy, and I really try to make this a collegial court, a collaborative court,” said DiPentima, who heads the Rules Advisory Committee with its co-chair, Connecticut Supreme Court Associate Justice Richard Palmer. “That means a lot to me,” she said.
That collegial tone is evident, said Connecticut Appellate Court Judge Christine Keller.
“We are the intermediate court and we really do not have inter-judge squabbles,” Keller said Friday. “We do not tend to have a high degree of personality conflicts and that's because she sets the tone and is very measured and considerate.”
The best part of being a judge, DiPentima said, is the ability to make a difference as part of a court that hears about 70 cases a term. during each of its eight terms. While the court will hear about 70 cases a term or 500 cases in a court year, each judge in the Appellate Court will hear about 18-20 cases a term.
“There is just an unbelievable amount of diversity and issues and facts that come before us,” she said. “The fact that I can be part of deciding the best resolution in a case is so rewarding. I'm grateful.”
In 2007, the then-chief judge appointed DiPentima chairwoman of the newly formed Public Services and Trust Commission, which created a five-year strategic plan for the judicial branch. That work is ongoing and DiPentima now oversees the implementation of the plan, dealing with human capital and addressing the needs of the workforce within the judicial branch.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250