Viewpoint: Legalization of Marijuana Should Proceed With Caution
Before the Legislature embraces Gov. Ned Lamont's invitation to legalize marijuana, we hope it does its homework to assess if indeed marijuana has both short- and long-term effects on the body and the brain.
February 08, 2019 at 09:49 AM
3 minute read
Ten states and Washington, D.C., have now legalized marijuana for recreational use for adults ages 21 and older, and 33 states have legalized medical marijuana. Connecticut is among a handful of states seriously considering legalizing recreational use. We need to look before we leap.
It has been six years since Colorado and Washington legalized marijuana, and scientists continue to unearth more data on the effects of the drug. Very recently, research presented at the 2018 meeting of the Society for Neuroscience showed marijuana use in teenagers affects the development of areas of the brain responsible for self-control and planning, and a study recently published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry showed that abstinence for one month from cannabis improves the memory of adolescents and young.
Other articles have highlighted the effects of cannabis addiction, which is estimated to impact 9 percent of all overall users. These findings are often ignored as the legalization movement sweeps across the nation. A professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University warned in an Atlantic article about its risks: “In large national surveys, about 1 in 10 people who smoke it say they have a lot of problems. They say things like, 'I have trouble quitting. I think a lot about quitting and I can't do it. I smoked more than I intended to. I neglect responsibilities.'”
Another professor of psychiatry—this one at University of Colorado School of Medicine who is co-leading a $5.5 million study of 5,000 sets of twins funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse on the impact that legalization has on mental health and substance use—pleads that much-needed examination must proceed, as rigorous, large-scale research has been limited.
We do know that, if you start smoking pot as a teenager, you have a much higher likelihood of getting addicted, as the adolescent brain is far more sensitive to the effects than the brain of an adult. Some argue that marijuana can be a gateway to more detrimental substances, such as cocaine and prescription pills. According to a 2015 study conducted by researchers at Yale School of Medicine, a person who uses marijuana is 2½ times more likely to abuse prescription opioids.
And then there is the danger of becoming addicted to marijuana itself. It is estimated that three million people suffer from marijuana use disorder. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defines that as significant impairment of functioning and distress, as well as symptoms such as cravings and difficulty stopping resulting from using marijuana for at least a year.
Although studies have not determined that legalizing or decriminalizing marijuana leads inexorably to increased use among adolescents, this may be because it is already almost commonplace—more teenagers now smoke marijuana than products with nicotine. In fact, between 30 and 40 percent of high-school seniors report smoking pot in the past year—about 20 percent got high in the past month—and about 6 percent admit to using virtually every day. The potential consequences are unlikely to be rare or trivial.
So before the Legislature embraces Gov. Ned Lamont's invitation to legalize marijuana, we hope it does its homework to assess if indeed marijuana has both short- and long-term effects on the body and the brain.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllADVANCE Act Offers Conn. Opportunity to Enhance Carbon-Free Energy and Improve Reliability With Advanced Nuclear Technologies
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250