Willimantic Housing Authority Sued Over Alleged Ridicule of Disabled Employee
Katherine Cardona claims in a federal lawsuit she was fired from the Willimantic Housing Authority due to her Hispanic origin and her hearing disability. She is seeking monetary damages.
February 19, 2019 at 04:44 PM
3 minute read
A former employee of the Willimantic Housing Authority has filed a federal lawsuit against the public housing agency, claiming she was ridiculed because of her race and disability and then wrongfully terminated.
In her lawsuit, filed Feb. 15 in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut, Katherine Cardona said Kim Haddad, the authority's executive director, repeatedly demeaned and discriminated against her.
The lawsuit, which seeks an unspecified amount of punitive damages, back pay and front pay damages, alleges Haddad and the authority violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title III of the federal Americans with Disability Act.
A resident of Willimantic in Windham County, Cardona is 53 and Hispanic. She suffers from hearing loss. She alleges in the lawsuit that Haddad and others demeaned her on numerous occasions. During one incident, the lawsuit claims Haddad and assistant director Judy Smith would intentionally speak in a low voice, despite being aware of Cardona's hearing disability. In addition, the lawsuit states, “Haddad targeted Hispanics to discriminate against” by instructing Cardona and other Hispanic employees “not to speak Spanish in the office, without giving the employees any reason for this instruction.”
“It was a nightmare for my client to work there,” said Cardona's attorney, Jamie Sullivan, a managing partner at Hartford-based Howard Kohn Sprague & FitzGerald. “There was ongoing verbal abuse and a demeaning attitude by Ms. Haddad toward my client for years.”
Cardona, who worked as a public housing leasing clerk and then moved to the position of Section 8 leasing clerk, worked for the authority for five years until she was fired in March 2018. Her suit says she was absent from work on Feb. 20, 2018. While the authority allowed Cardona's medical provider to give electronically signed medical notes without an actual signature in the past when she missed work, this time, Sullivan said, the authority demanded a signed note explaining her absence.
On March 4, nearly two weeks after her absence from work, Cardona explained to Haddad that she waited at the medical facility walk-in clinic but left before being seen because there was a long wait time, and because she felt anxious, nauseous and had migraines.
The next day, on March 5, the authority had a predisciplinary hearing on the absence with Cardona, Haddad and a union representative. During that hearing Cardona reiterated her reasons for leaving the clinic, according to the lawsuit. But Haddad fired her the same day.
Sullivan said Cardona was fired without just cause, and suggested the agency continues to act against its former employee.
“They are trying to contest her right to receive unemployment,” Sullivan said. “They claim she was guilty of misconduct related to the medical note. It's all a frivolous denial of her rights to collect unemployment.”
As of press time, the housing authority had not assigned an attorney to the case, and neither Haddad nor Smith responded to a request for comment Tuesday.
The matter is scheduled to be heard in front of Judge Warren Eginton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
3 minute readTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1With AI Expected to Be a Focus This Year, What Changes Can Midsize Firms Expect?
- 2Dissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
- 3NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 4DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 5Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250