Gay Attorneys Find Acceptance, Thanks in Part to Client Initiatives
Three gay and one transgender attorney discuss changing attitudes toward gender and sexual orientation among law firms and their clients.
February 20, 2019 at 04:58 PM
5 minute read
While gay attorneys say stigmas and attitudes about LGBTQ people began to change in the 1990s as more people became familiar with that community, the state's only openly transgender equity partner said he had some pushback from the law firm he worked for when transitioning back in 2002.
Beck Fineman has been with Ryan Ryan Deluca, a 50-year-old-plus Stamford firm, for 11 years. But back in 2002 he worked as a paralegal for Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. There was mixed reaction from staff at the powerhouse firm to his transitioning to a man.
“It was a mixed bag,” Fineman said. “I did not fear for my job and I think they did what they could to be supportive. But 'transgender' was not part of the mainstream vocabulary then and there were some negative responses within the firm, including from my supervisor at the time. It was all out of a lack of familiarity with what it means to be transgender.”
The 39-year-old Rockville, Maryland, native said he's noticed a softening of views in the past 17 years toward transgender people — acceptance reflected within law firms and their clients.
“I haven't experienced a lot of overt pushback or discrimination,” Fineman said. “I'm not visibly queer and I think that makes a difference.”
Unbeknownst to Fineman, Ryan Ryan Deluca had done its due diligence, and knew all about his background before bringing him on board.
“My being transgender never came up in the interview. And then on day one, the partner who hired me came into my office and asked how things were going and said all the equity partners here know you are trans,” Fineman recalled. “She told me she wanted me to know they had my back and if someone has any problem, it's their problem and not my problem. She also said I had the green light to be as vocal about it or as not vocal about it as I wanted.”
Fineman said people usually can't tell from looking at him that he is transgender and he still hears homo- and transgender-phobic comments from time to time. He'll make a point to say something when that occurs, he said. But people such as him, Fineman said, can be a champion for others. “The more young lawyers and law students see out LGBTQ lawyers succeeding, and judges succeeding and law professionals succeeding, I think that will go a long way toward opening doors much wider.”
Erick Russell and Jessica Grossarth Kennedy are both gay attorneys at Pullman & Comley, the same firm gay Connecticut Associate Supreme Court Justice Andrew McDonald once worked for. The firm is seen as progressive by many.
Read more—'Scared as Hell': This Judge's Father Told Him No One Would Hire a Gay Lawyer
Russell, 30, helped create and now chairs the LGBT section within the Connecticut Bar Association. He says there's more acceptance of gay attorneys today, but acknowledged there's work ahead to undo old attitudes.
“It takes time for that tide to change,” he said.
Grossarth Kennedy, a partner in the firm's government finance department, suggests the shift is coming from an unlikely source: law firm clients.
“We have clients ask all the time about our diversity and inclusion efforts,” she said.
Those demands have driven focused recruitment and diversity, prompting firms to participate in events such as the annual Lavender Conference, which is geared toward the LGBTQ community.
Since 2004 Shipman & Goodwin has been a mainstay at the conference, which began in the 1980s. Its partner and chairman of its hiring committee is Kevin Roy, a gay man who participates in the conference every year and helps the firm recruit talented attorneys from among attendees.
“We think attending the conference is the right thing to do in order to reflect the community and client base,” Roy said. “Our firm also has a strategic plan, and one of the major points in the plan is diversity.”
While there are equal opportunity employment laws, Roy said there are no pitfalls in targeting gay attorneys for hire from the conference. “We make similar efforts in all forms of diversity,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Partners Reevaluating Need for In-Person Conferences Post-Pandemic
3 minute readAdoption of Contract Analytics All Comes Down to Trust
Morgan Lewis eData Founder: Legal Should View Data 'The Way Silicon Valley Does'
Trending Stories
- 1The end of the 'Rust' criminal case against Alec Baldwin may unlock a civil lawsuit
- 2Solana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders This Year
- 4What's Next For Johnson & Johnson's Talcum Powder Litigation?
- 5The Legal's Top 5 Pennsylvania Verdicts of 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250