Michael Cohen Officially Disbarred in New York State
The former attorney and fixer to Donald Trump pleaded guilty to federal charges that the state appellate panel found analogous to actions that deserved disbarment under state law.
February 26, 2019 at 02:49 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former personal attorney, has been disbarred by the Appellate Division, First Department's grievance committee in Manhattan, following his guilty pleas to federal felony charges earlier this year.
Multiple sources were initially able to confirm the contents of the order for the New York Law Journal. The order's release was not official; it was postdated to be released on Feb. 28. As a result of the postdated order being released earlier than expected, the First Department opted to make public the order on Tuesday.
The panel of Justices Dianne Renwick, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, Angela Mazzarelli, Jeffery Oing, and Peter Moulton found that Cohen's guilty pleas to tax evasion, campaign finance law violations, and lying to Congress resulted in him being disbarred under New York State law.
“A conviction of a federal felony triggers disbarment by operation of law if the offense would constitute a felony if committed under New York law,” the panel wrote in its letter. The panel noted that lying to Congress would constitute a felony offense of offering a false instrument under state law.
Cohen did not respond to a request for comment.
According to the panel, the department's attorney grievance committee began proceedings to disbar Cohen in October, after he pleaded guilty in August to the tax evasion and campaign finance charges brought by prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
As that process was proceeding, Cohen pleaded guilty to the additional charges of lying to Congress, brought by the Office of the Special Counsel Robert Mueller III in Manhattan federal court.
Cohen was sentenced on both charges in December.
Following the actions in federal court, the First Department was asked to consolidate the previous request for disbarment with a new one based on Cohen's second conviction. According to the panel, Cohen was served with a document regarding the motions, but never bothered to respond.
The panel noted that the analogous law convictions are supported by a plea taken and the text of the indictment. As the state false instrument and federal lying to Congress crimes are parallel, Cohen's pleading to the one was the equivalent to the other. The panel declined to go further to look at Cohen's prior conviction.
Susan DeSantis and Jason Grant contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250