Paul Manafort Will Never Practice Law in Native Connecticut After Bar Resignation
The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel has accepted Paul Manafort's resignation from the Connecticut Bar, for which he will never be allowed to practice law again. Manafort resigned after learning that the chief disciplinary counsel was seeking to hold hearings on his status as a lawyer in Connecticut.
March 06, 2019 at 11:13 AM
3 minute read
Disgraced former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort Jr. will never practice law again in his native Connecticut, the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel announced this week.
In its reporting of January disciplinary actions facing Connecticut attorneys, the OCDC Tuesday wrote that Manafort, who resigned from the state bar ahead of misconduct hearings, has waived his right to “apply for readmission to the bar at any time in the future.”
In waiving his rights, Manafort “has not been subjected to coercion or duress, and the respondent is fully aware of the consequences of submitting the resignation,” according to the filing.
The 69-year-old New Britain native learned back in November that Connecticut was seeking to disbar him from practicing law in the Nutmeg State, even though Manafort has no law practice, offices or clients in the state. He was admitted to the Connecticut Bar in 1974. Manafort, whose father, Paul Manafort Sr., was a Republican mayor from New Britain, also faces a disbarment hearing in Washington, D.C.
The OCDC brought its presentment case against Manafort late last year in light of his guilty pleas on two conspiracy counts, including one covering varied offenses related to his lobbying work and efforts to conceal income, and another related to witness tampering that landed him in a Virginia jail.
At the time, Brian Staines, chief disciplinary counsel from the OCDC, told the Connecticut Law Tribune that rules governing the disciplinary counsel allowed the office to impose penalties on an attorney following the conviction of a crime.
Trump brought Manafort, a longtime Republican political consultant, to his team in the spring of 2016 to help him lock up the nomination of his party at the Republican National Convention that summer.
Manafort could face more than a decade in prison when he is sentenced in two separate court hearings this week and next week.
According to NBC News, in the first charges brought on behalf of special counsel Robert Mueller III, Manafort was accused of failing to report $16.5 million in income for political consulting work on behalf of the Russian-backed government of Ukraine and its former president, Viktor Yanukovych. In addition, a Virginia jury found Manafort guilty of not paying taxes on that income and failing to report foreign lobbying.
Manafort was also convicted of providing false information to a bank in order to get favorable loans.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250