6 Connecticut Attorneys Disciplined in February, Grievance Committee Reports
Six Connecticut attorneys were reprimanded by the Statewide Grievance Committee in February.
March 07, 2019 at 02:13 PM
5 minute read
Connecticut's Statewide Grievance Committee this week announced disciplinary action against six attorneys, including presentment, reprimands and suspensions.
Here is a look at attorneys, listed alphabetically, whose ethics charges led to disciplinary action in February.
David Chomick:
The Statewide Grievance Committee made a presentment in the case of Glastonbury-based solo practitioner David Chomick. Its reviewing committee found Chomick acted improperly toward a client who retained him to discuss a crumbling foundation at a residential property.
The client paid Chomick a $1,000 fee, but the reviewing committee said the attorney did not provide a written fee agreement in connection with the representation. In addition, the client had asked if Chomick had filed the necessary paperwork with the state's consumer protection agency, but later learned the attorney never had. The client then ended up filing her own paperwork.
The committee found Chomick engaged in “unethical conduct,” and said his reasoning regarding confusion over whether there was an active mailing address for his office was not credible.
The presentment is pending a final decision from the SGC.
William Fernandez:
New York resident and Connecticut attorney William Fernandez has been suspended from practicing law in the Nutmeg State for 90 days, effective Feb. 25.
The SGC found that Fernandez, who is an immigration attorney, engaged in misconduct. In its presentment, the committee found that Fernandez was guilty of misconduct “involving his character, integrity, and professional standing” during his representation of a citizen from El Salvador who was placed in expedited deportation proceedings. Soon after taking that case, Fernandez was suspended from practicing law for five months in an unrelated matter, but did not tell his current client about his suspension.
The reviewing committee of the SGC found “clear and convincing evidence” that Fernandez “failed to communicate with the complainant adequately.”
Justin Freeman:
The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel placed Hartford attorney Justin Freeman on interim suspension, effective immediately. The suspension follows Freeman's pleading guilty to filing false tax returns over a three-year period.
Freeman, who underreported more than $1 million and faces upward of three years in prison, will be sentenced early next month.
Related story: Hartford Attorney Suspended for Filing False Tax Returns Omitting $1M
Frederick Lovejoy:
Easton-based solo practitioner Frederick Lovejoy has been reprimanded for engaging in “unethical conduct” with regard to his business relationship with Computer Reporting Services LLC, a company that provides reporting services to attorneys.
After Lovejoy did not pay the company's bills, CRS commenced a small-action claim against him and his firm, Lovejoy & Associates. The grievance committee found that Lovejoy used “means that had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden CRS in obtaining payments for services rendered.” At issue was $15,653, including costs and attorney fees.
Rachael Rosenberg:
The OCDC has suspended Massachusetts resident Rachael Rosenberg, who is also licensed in Massachusetts, from practicing law in Connecticut for six months, effective Jan. 31. The suspension mirrors the one Rosenberg got in Massachusetts in October.
Rosenberg was cited, in Massachusetts, for failing to “competently and diligently” represent clients in three separate cases. In one case, she was representing a couple in a small-claims matter, but never filed the necessary documents in court. A second involved a client who had hired Rosenberg to pursue a wrongful termination suit against a former employer. In that case, the committee found Rosenberg repeatedly canceled appointments with her client. In the third case, Rosenberg was representing a client in a workers' compensation and Social Security disability claim. The attorney, the court said, failed over several weeks to respond to the client's attempts to contact her and update her on the case.
Harry Tun:
The OCDC has suspended Washington, D.C., resident Harry Tun, who is also licensed in Washington, D.C., and Connecticut, from practicing law in Connecticut for one year, effective Feb. 5. The one-year suspension echoes Tun's penalty in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in October.
Tun was cited for improper payment for representing indigent criminal defendants in Washington, D.C. The U.S. Attorney's Office found that Tun had, among other things, sought payment for the same time period for two or more clients on 162 occasions. The USAO agreed not to file criminal charges against Tun if he repaid “the $16,034 in overpayments he had received as a result of the false reporting.” The USAO notified the OCDC, which issued the one-year suspension.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250