6 Connecticut Attorneys Disciplined in February, Grievance Committee Reports
Six Connecticut attorneys were reprimanded by the Statewide Grievance Committee in February.
March 07, 2019 at 02:13 PM
5 minute read
Connecticut's Statewide Grievance Committee this week announced disciplinary action against six attorneys, including presentment, reprimands and suspensions.
Here is a look at attorneys, listed alphabetically, whose ethics charges led to disciplinary action in February.
David Chomick:
The Statewide Grievance Committee made a presentment in the case of Glastonbury-based solo practitioner David Chomick. Its reviewing committee found Chomick acted improperly toward a client who retained him to discuss a crumbling foundation at a residential property.
The client paid Chomick a $1,000 fee, but the reviewing committee said the attorney did not provide a written fee agreement in connection with the representation. In addition, the client had asked if Chomick had filed the necessary paperwork with the state's consumer protection agency, but later learned the attorney never had. The client then ended up filing her own paperwork.
The committee found Chomick engaged in “unethical conduct,” and said his reasoning regarding confusion over whether there was an active mailing address for his office was not credible.
The presentment is pending a final decision from the SGC.
William Fernandez:
New York resident and Connecticut attorney William Fernandez has been suspended from practicing law in the Nutmeg State for 90 days, effective Feb. 25.
The SGC found that Fernandez, who is an immigration attorney, engaged in misconduct. In its presentment, the committee found that Fernandez was guilty of misconduct “involving his character, integrity, and professional standing” during his representation of a citizen from El Salvador who was placed in expedited deportation proceedings. Soon after taking that case, Fernandez was suspended from practicing law for five months in an unrelated matter, but did not tell his current client about his suspension.
The reviewing committee of the SGC found “clear and convincing evidence” that Fernandez “failed to communicate with the complainant adequately.”
Justin Freeman:
The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel placed Hartford attorney Justin Freeman on interim suspension, effective immediately. The suspension follows Freeman's pleading guilty to filing false tax returns over a three-year period.
Freeman, who underreported more than $1 million and faces upward of three years in prison, will be sentenced early next month.
Related story: Hartford Attorney Suspended for Filing False Tax Returns Omitting $1M
Frederick Lovejoy:
Easton-based solo practitioner Frederick Lovejoy has been reprimanded for engaging in “unethical conduct” with regard to his business relationship with Computer Reporting Services LLC, a company that provides reporting services to attorneys.
After Lovejoy did not pay the company's bills, CRS commenced a small-action claim against him and his firm, Lovejoy & Associates. The grievance committee found that Lovejoy used “means that had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden CRS in obtaining payments for services rendered.” At issue was $15,653, including costs and attorney fees.
Rachael Rosenberg:
The OCDC has suspended Massachusetts resident Rachael Rosenberg, who is also licensed in Massachusetts, from practicing law in Connecticut for six months, effective Jan. 31. The suspension mirrors the one Rosenberg got in Massachusetts in October.
Rosenberg was cited, in Massachusetts, for failing to “competently and diligently” represent clients in three separate cases. In one case, she was representing a couple in a small-claims matter, but never filed the necessary documents in court. A second involved a client who had hired Rosenberg to pursue a wrongful termination suit against a former employer. In that case, the committee found Rosenberg repeatedly canceled appointments with her client. In the third case, Rosenberg was representing a client in a workers' compensation and Social Security disability claim. The attorney, the court said, failed over several weeks to respond to the client's attempts to contact her and update her on the case.
Harry Tun:
The OCDC has suspended Washington, D.C., resident Harry Tun, who is also licensed in Washington, D.C., and Connecticut, from practicing law in Connecticut for one year, effective Feb. 5. The one-year suspension echoes Tun's penalty in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in October.
Tun was cited for improper payment for representing indigent criminal defendants in Washington, D.C. The U.S. Attorney's Office found that Tun had, among other things, sought payment for the same time period for two or more clients on 162 occasions. The USAO agreed not to file criminal charges against Tun if he repaid “the $16,034 in overpayments he had received as a result of the false reporting.” The USAO notified the OCDC, which issued the one-year suspension.
Related Stories:
8 Connecticut Attorneys Disciplined in January
7 Connecticut Attorneys Disciplined, Grievance Committee Reports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Jan. 20
- 2Saxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
- 3Judicial Admissions and Medical Malpractice Defense
- 4South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 5'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250