Jury Renders $543,889 Verdict for Hartford Woman Who Sued City
A Hartford Superior Court jury has found the city was liable for injuries Barbara Browdy suffered after falling on an uneven sidewalk. The jury awarded Browdy, who injured her shoulder, $543,889.
March 08, 2019 at 11:27 AM
4 minute read
A Superior Court jury has returned a $543,889 verdict in favor of a woman who sued Hartford after injuring her shoulder from falling on an uneven city sidewalk.
The jury deliberated for two and a half hours on Feb. 28 before returning its verdict in favor of 73-year-old Hartford resident Barbara Browdy. According to a November 2016 lawsuit filed in Hartford Superior Court, Browdy fell on a sidewalk near 2113 Main St. that was cracked, separated and uneven in a way that created a raised hump in the pavement.
The city argued that Browdy was at fault, and hoped to prove to the six-person jury that she deserved no damages.
“The matter really came down to whether the city or my client was at fault,” said Chris Flood, the attorney for Browdy and a partner in Middletown-based The Flood Law Firm. “There is the issue of sole proximate cause, which means that the plaintiff can't be even 1 percent at fault. If the jury finds she is even 1 percent at fault, then she can't win. That was a big battle in this case. The city maintained she should have seen the defect and avoided it.”
Browdy, who testified for about 90 minutes during the day-and-a-half trial, told jurors about herself and what happened when she fell in November 2014, Flood said.
“She was working full time doing clerical work for a health insurance company and was enjoying a rare day off,” Flood told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “She went to get her hair done and when leaving the salon, in walking to the bus stop, she fell on the sidewalk. She maintained she was walking straight ahead, as she always does.”
The jury heard from only two witnesses: Browdy and Michael Deane, a public works employee for the city, according to Flood.
Deane, Flood said, told the jurors that the city did not have the resources to inspect all of Hartford's sidewalks.
“I think what swayed the jury was that the city was not pro-actively inspecting its sidewalks,” Flood said. “They admitted they did not allocate enough resources to properly inspect them and, as a result, my client was left with a horrific injury.”
Browdy, Flood said, fell forward. She put her left arm out to try to cushion the fall and in doing so fractured her arm and tore her shoulder. She also hit her face on the ground, Flood said.
Browdy ended up undergoing two shoulder surgeries: one to put plates and screws in and the second was a shoulder replacement surgery, Flood said.
“She was left with pretty severe mobility restrictions,” her attorney said. She can't lift her left arm over her head and has no strength in her left arm. It also aches a lot.”
Browdy, who had $127,899 in medical expenses, had earlier settled with two other defendants—Roth Supply LLC and 2099-2013 Main Street—for $60,000.
The city has until March 20 to appeal the verdict to the Connecticut Appellate Court. Browdy will not see any money until all legal avenues have been exhausted.
Representing Hartford was Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel Jonathan Beamon, who declined to comment on Friday.
But in court documents the defense maintained Browdy was negligent and responsible for her own fall. Among other things, the city maintained Browdy failed to avoid the sidewalk defect, failed to watch where she was stepping, was inattentive to her surroundings, and “failed to make proper and reasonable use of her senses and faculties.”
The city also wrote that Browdy's negligence exceeds any on the part of the city.
Read More:
Hartford Man Who Injured Knee in Fall Through Floor Settles Case for $150,000
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readNew Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
2 minute readJudge Reduces Attorneys' Award in Boston Sidewalk Settlement for Repetitive Billing
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 2'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 3Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 5State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250