Former Bridgeport Assistant School Superintendent Files Reverse-Discrimination Suit
Former Bridgeport administrator Deborah Santacapita claims her job was eliminated because she is white and disabled. Her lawsuit claims her job performance far exceeded that of two black peers with the same job title.
March 11, 2019 at 11:38 AM
4 minute read
A former Bridgeport assistant superintendent of schools has sued the school district claiming she was laid off because she has a disability and is white.
In her reverse-discrimination federal lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut against the Bridgeport Board of Education, Deborah Santacapita said her position was eliminated while two black assistant superintendents who were less qualified kept their jobs.
The move, the lawsuit states, would not have happened if Santacapita were black.
“The defendant and its superintendent of schools have stated that a goal for the defendant was to increase the number of minority educators that it employs,” the lawsuit states. “A motivating factor in the defendant's decision to lay off the plaintiff as opposed to laying off [her two black peers] was its goal of increasing the number of minority educators in its employ.”
Most students in the Bridgeport school district are minorities.
The lawsuit further states that “[o]ther than for her race and color, the plaintiff would not have been laid off by the defendant.” The lawsuit cites violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act.
Bridgeport Superintendent of Schools Aresta Johnson, City and Board of Education attorney R. Christopher Meyer and the two black assistant superintendents did not respond to requests for comment Monday.
The lawsuit maintains that Santacapita, who was employed in various roles at the school district from 1995 to July 2018, informed Johnson in March 2018 that she was suffering from advanced degenerative disc disease and stenosis for which she might need surgery at the beginning of the 2018-19 school year. The disease substantially limits a person's major life activities, including standing, bending, walking and working.
The lawsuit states that on July 13, 2018, chief talent officer and human resources staffer Frank Chester hand-delivered a document titled “Separation Agreement and General Release” to Santacapita, stating that her position would be eliminated. The letter also stated that “the parties mutually agree that Santacapita's employment with the board should end.”
The lawsuit states that Santacapita, who worked for the district for 23 years, “was never provided any notice that her position was being eliminated and never agreed that her employment should end.” Her position was officially eliminated five days later.
The lawsuit further states that Santacapita's “performance as assistant superintendent of schools exceeded” that of her black counterparts.
The lawsuit states that Santacapita, a Fairfield resident, received various promotions during her tenure and obtained various advanced degrees in education, including being awarded a doctorate degree. It adds that she also has master's and bachelor's degrees in art.
The lawsuit says one of the two black assistant superintendents possesses neither a doctorate degree or a superintendent's certificate. In addition, it claims that “the plaintiff attended meetings with the superintendent of schools and the other assistant superintendents during which the superintendent of schools would express her disappointment with the job performance of [the two black assistant superintendents], asserting they did not follow her instructions, directions, and communications in a timely and effective manner. … The plaintiff was never criticized by the superintendent of schools in this manner.”
The suit goes on to say that Johnson employed an “executive coach” to assist the two black assistant superintendents in the performance of their job duties, while Santacapita did not require that assistance, nor was one assigned to her.
Representing Santacapita is Thomas Bucci of Bridgeport-based Willinger, Willinger & Bucci. Bucci declined to comment on the lawsuit.
The case is scheduled to be heard in front of Judge Janet Bond Arterton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Patent Disputes Over SharkNinja, Dyson Products Nearing Resolution
Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Trending Stories
- 1Can Passive Technology Change the Impaired Driving Trajectory?
- 2Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
- 37th Circ. Rejects Liability Claims Against Freight Broker's Hiring Choices
- 4Sullivan & Cromwell Signals 5-Day RTO Expectation as Law Firms Remain Split on Optimal Attendance
- 5CLOSED: These Georgia Courts Won't Open Jan. 10
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250