Norwich Diocese Pays $900,000 to Settle Claims Priest Abused Boy for a Decade
The Norwich Diocese has settled a third lawsuit claiming then-priest Paul Hebert sexually assaulted young boys. In the latest settlement, the diocese agreed to pay Jonathan Roy $900,000.
March 12, 2019 at 02:43 PM
4 minute read
The Norwich Roman Catholic Diocese has paid $900,000 to settle a lawsuit alleging a priest sexually abused a boy for 10 years, beginning when the child was 11 years old.
Plaintiff Jonathan Roy, now 40, is one of multiple men to bring allegations against Paul Hebert, who retired from the Most Holy Trinity Church in Pomfret, where he served as priest until 2004. His case was the third time the diocese has settled a suit involving Hebert, who died in 2010 after serving several congregations.
Plaintiffs counsel was Kelly Reardon, partner at The Reardon Law Firm in New London. Her client's pleadings alleged Hebert assaulted Roy “hundreds of times.” Reardon said her client insisted on going public, and filed suit against the Norwich Diocese in 2016.
The two sides settled Monday.
Representing the Norwich Diocese is Brad Babbitt of Robinson & Cole. Babbitt did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
In an email statement, Diocese spokesman Wayne Gignac said: “We hope that the recent settlement reached in the case of allegations concerning late Father Paul Hebert brings closure to the parties involved.”
In court papers filed in February 2017, the diocese claimed many of the counts against the institution should be dismissed because they implicate “matters of religious doctrine and practice.”
“Although the court can adjudicate secular claims against a religious institution, it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over specific allegations that implicate religious matters and doctrine, contained within otherwise secular counts,” the group argued.
The suit alleges the church knew Hebert had acted inappropriately with boys and young men, going back to 1980, but did nothing. Reardon said the priest sexually assaulted Roy from 1990, when the child was a church altar boy, to about 2000.
Reardon said there was information about a disturbing incident involving another young man decades earlier, when Hebert worked in St. Michael Church in Pawcatuck, about 50 miles from Pomfret.
“There was a memorandum in Father Hebert's files from 1980,” Reardon said. “The chairman of the Board of Vicars of Priests detailed an incident in Pawcatuck regarding an inappropriate incident with a male adult parishioner. Instead of responding appropriately to this incident, they [church officials] discouraged that victim from going to the police and reporting it. Obviously, we believe they should have taken steps to remove Father Hebert from the priesthood at that time, and they should have reported the incident to the authorities.”
The lawsuit states that Daniel Reilly, who was bishop and chief executive officer of the Norwich diocese from 1975 to 1994, and Daniel Hart, who was bishop and chief executive officer of the diocese from 1994 to 2003, knew about Hebert's inappropriate behavior toward boys, and did nothing. Hart is dead, but Reilly, who is now 91 years old and living in Massachusetts, declined to comment Tuesday.
Reardon said Roy stopped the alleged assaults when he was 21 years old, and told his parents in 2016, right before he filed suit.
“He really was brainwashed by this molester,” Reardon said. “[Herbert would] give him large sums of money, alcohol and many presents.”
Roy began therapy in 2016 and is “doing fairly well” today, his attorney said.
“He still struggles with the effect of the abuse,” Reardon said. “He, fortunately, has a good support system in place. He is very pleased with the settlement and feels as if a chapter of his life that was extremely disturbing and difficult is coming to an end.”
While many sexual assault victims choose to remain anonymous, Reardon said it was important for Roy to attach his name to the lawsuit.
“He wanted others to know there is no shame in being a victim,” Reardon said. “He wanted to ensure that other victims would feel able and empowered to come forward.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250