Kia, Hyundai Face Deep Litigation Exposure Over Hundreds of Car Fires
As an investigation into car fires by Korean automakers Kia and Hyundai begins to take course, legal experts say that probe could determine these companies' exposure to civil litigation.
March 19, 2019 at 05:12 PM
4 minute read
One day after Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced his office would lead a multistate investigation into nationwide car fires involving Korean automakers Hyundai and Kia, legal experts said the result of that probe could determine those companies' litigation risks.
The two companies have recalled 500,000 vehicles over the fire risk, and Fortune.com reports there have been 300 engine fires since June.
Now, their risks seem to hinge on whether investigators could find the automobile manufacturers put profits over consumer safety. Meanwhile, it's not clear, to date, what other states could join Connecticut in its investigation of the car fires.
If the Tong-led investigation shows intentional malfeasance and neglect, the automakers could face a long road ahead, according to University of Connecticut School of Law professor Alexandra Lahav.
“The fact that they want to do an investigation does not mean it will yield evidence of wrongdoing, but if they find evidence that the cars have a propensity to spontaneously combust and this was known, then they have an obvious serious exposure legally for the car companies,” said Lahav, who specializes in mass torts and complex litigation. “It would mean a recall and probably many civil suits. You can just look at the many lawsuits against Volkswagen for the emission scandal, or GM arising out of the Kobalt car ignition-switch issue. If that is the case, you are looking at substantial exposure. But it all depends on what the investigation shows, and what the problem is.”
Similarly, Hartford-based attorney Jamie Sullivan said, “If the company had knowledge that these fires were a risk, and they made a business calculation that the costs of the fires would be less than the profits to be made from selling their defective vehicles, they'd be subject to punitive damages and a lot of lawsuits.”
But both Lahav and Sullivan said they believe the two carmakers could weather the fallout, even if they are found to have been in the wrong.
“They can survive,” said Sullivan, managing partner at Howard Kohn Sprague & FitzGerald. “There are some really loyal customers that really like and prefer Hyundais. People thought Volkswagen would go under, and they survived.”
Lahav agreed Hyundai and Kia could ride out the storm.
“One of the biggest costs to companies is reputational injury, in that people do not trust the car company,” she said. “If that's the case, they will buy a different brand. I don't think, though, that people will change their behavior until some kind of proof [of wrongdoing] comes out.”
In his release Monday, Tong said, “This is a serious matter, and we are moving aggressively and responsibly to uncover the facts and to ensure accountability.” The release noted there have been accounts of Hyundai and Kia vehicles spontaneously bursting into flames, and catching fire while driving or parked.
Both automobile manufacturers initiated recalls of several hundred thousand cars equipped with the Theta II Gasoline Direct Injection engine beginning in 2015. Fortune also reports that the carmakers are the subject of three separate recalls from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA.
Representatives of Hyundai and Kia said they are working to address the issues.
James Hope, national manager, product communication for Kia Motors America, said in a statement: “The safety of our customers is one of Kia's top priorities and we take this matter seriously. Kia is fully cooperating with state investigators into the performance of our vehicles and we have and will continue to openly share information and data with NHTSA and other investigative bodies in a full and transparent manner.”
Kia also said it voluntarily initiated several measures to ensure it addressed every noncollision vehicle fire. In June 2017, for instance, Kia recalled more than 600,000 Optimas, Sorentos and Sportage vehicles to address a manufacturing defect that could lead to engine failure and, in rare instances, fire.
Michael Stewart, senior group manager of corporate and marketing public relations for Hyundai, wrote, “Hyundai is fully cooperating with the government in this matter, and is committed to providing American motorists with safe, high quality, efficient and affordable vehicles.”
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Overcomes Low Medical Bills, Captures $1 Million Policy Limit
2 minute readCourt Battle Over Musk's Compensation Is Far From Over, Even After Ratification Vote, Experts Say
3 minute readTesla Shareholder Attorneys Ask for $5.6B in Stock to Cover Fees, in Record Request
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250