Campus Cop: Repeated Rapes by Fellow Officer Ignored at CCSU
A federal lawsuit filed Tuesday alleges a female CCSU police officer was raped three times by a fellow officer. The suit claims the woman was also sexually harassed by other co-workers and superiors. It seeks compensatory and punitive damages.
March 20, 2019 at 12:45 PM
4 minute read
A former eight-year veteran of the Central Connecticut State University Police Department has accused a former fellow officer of raping her on three separate occasions, and says her superiors failed to investigate the alleged crimes.
The 40-page federal lawsuit filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in the District of Connecticut alleges the plaintiff, only identified as Jane Doe, was also subjected to other officers and supervisors propositioning her for sex. She also claimed those same people “repeatedly touched her breasts and buttocks in the workplace.”
The lawsuit claims the university hired officers with “red flags” in their background.
“This is a case about abject institutional failure at Central Connecticut State University that resulted in repeated acts of unspeakable sexual violence by one CCSU police officer against another,” the complaint states.
The lawsuit claims the atmosphere within the university's police force is fraught with misbehavior of a sexual nature. It claims the university allowed officers and their supervisors “to routinely make sexually graphic comments in the workplace about the female students they were tasked to protect and about their coworker, Officer Jane Doe.”
The law firm of Shipman & Goodwin conducted an independent investigation of the CCSU Police Department in 2018 and concluded that “sexual misconduct and assault was inevitable” in the environment within the school's police force, according to the lawsuit.
Janice Palmer, director of public relations for CCSU, said she'd look into the matter and give a comment. She had not provided a comment at press time.
Jane Doe was an officer from 2010 to July 2018 when she went on Family and Medical Leave Act leave. She has yet to return. Doe alleges the officer raped her twice in the summer of 2014 and once again in the fall of 2016. The lawsuit does not state why Doe did not report the alleged rapes to the city's police department, but says she was fearful of reporting it to the school's police force for fear of retaliation. Doe eventually reported the alleged sex assault to a lieutenant within the school's police force and to the university's police chief, but to no avail, according to her complaint.
The chief's response, the lawsuit says, “was more feeble that his lieutenant's.”
“He did and said nothing,” the complaint alleges.
Doe, the suit contends, suffered severe retaliation after telling her supervisors of the alleged rapes.
“Although senior officers on the force had previously subjected Officer Doe to bullying tactics, after her report the harassment intensified in frequency and nature,” the suit says. That harassment, the lawsuit says, was called “bogarting” and entailed usurping Doe's authority in making decisions for her when she was first on the scene of an incident in her primary jurisdiction.
Eventually, the lawsuit said, Doe notified a senior official with the university's Office of Diversity and Equity of the alleged assaults. Soon after, the police officer who allegedly raped Doe was put on paid leave for nearly a full year until the university terminated him. That male officer has an unlisted telephone number and could not be reached. In addition, someone who answered the phone at the police department Wednesday morning said the chief is out of the office for several weeks. The chief also has an unlisted telephone number and could not be reached for comment before press time.
Representing the plaintiff are Nina Pirrotti, Joshua Goodbaum and Elisabeth Lee, all of New Haven-based Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti. Pirrotti told the Connecticut Law Tribune the firm would not be commenting on the lawsuit.
The lawsuit seeks economic damages, compensatory damages and punitive damages,
The university has been in the news in recent months because several professors had been accused of having inappropriate relationships with female students.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250