Lawsuit: 3M's Defective Ear Plugs Caused Hearing Loss in Military Service Members
Connecticut veteran Jonathan Frew has sued 3M, claiming the manufacturer made defective earplugs that left him with severe hearing problems.
March 20, 2019 at 04:48 PM
3 minute read
Eight months after the 3M company agreed to pay the U.S. government $9.1 million to resolve allegations it knowingly sold the U.S. military defective earplugs, the first Connecticut lawsuit alleging the earplugs were unusable has been filed in federal court.
The latest product liability lawsuit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court in the District of Connecticut on behalf of former Green Beret Jonathan Frew, maintains the 32-year-old West Hartford resident's poor hearing is due solely to the alleged defective ear pieces.
Frew, who served in the Marine Corps from 2004 to 2007 and then as a Green Beret from 2007 to 2013, was diagnosed with hearing loss while on active duty, according to his attorney, Robert Reardon Jr., a partner with New London-based The Reardon Law Firm.
Frew served in Africa and Afghanistan. He has severe hearing loss in his left ear, less severe loss in his right ear, and uses hearing aids in both, Reardon said Wednesday. His hearing will not improve, and could worsen, his attorney said.
“This product was defective and dangerous,” Reardon told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “It did not live up to any of the representations made by 3M concerning the protection it was going to afford service members.”
The alleged defect arises from the stem of the ear plug being too short for proper insertion, leaving the eardrum vulnerable to injury.
“Weapons training means having weapons placed close to your ear when firing them,” said Reardon, who was a captain in the Marine Corps in the early 1970s. “It's so important that the protection you've been given is sufficient to ensure you do not suffer hearing damage.”
Hundreds of thousands of service members were given the 3M-made hearing devices, which were sold as dual-ended Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2, from 2003 to 2015, according to the plaintiff's side. Service members used the earplugs in the United States and overseas, Reardon said.
More than 300 lawsuits, including about 160 from Minnesota, have been filed in less than a year against the Minnesota-based company. Because of the number of pending lawsuits, the cases are likely to transfer to one federal judge in multidistrict litigation.
As of Wednesday afternoon, 3M had not appointed attorneys to the case.
Company spokeswoman Fanna Haile-Selassie denied the allegations.
“3M has great respect for the brave men and women who protect us around the world and their safety is our priority,” she wrote in a statement. “We have a long history of partnering with the U.S. military, and we continue to make products to help protect our troops and support their missions. We deny this product was defectively designed and will defend against the allegations in these lawsuits through the legal process.”
Even though the company reached the multimillion-dollar settlement last year with the U.S. government to resolve allegations around its ear plugs, the agreement states that 3M admitted no liability.
The suit seeks an undetermined amount of compensatory and punitive damages, as well as pre- and-post-judgment interest and attorney fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readJudge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250