Judge Tosses Reverse-Discrimination Claims Against Yale New Haven Hospital
Mary Ellen Taylor, who Yale New Haven Hospital accused of making derogatory comments toward fellow employees, had sued the institution claiming she was fired because of reverse discrimination. A federal judge this week ruled against Taylor, who is white, and dismissed her lawsuit.
March 27, 2019 at 04:03 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has made a summary judgment ruling in favor of Yale New Haven Hospital, dismissing a lawsuit filed on behalf of a former employee who claimed reverse discrimination.
Judge Stefan Underhill dismissed all seven counts that Mary Ellen Taylor, who is white, had leveled against the hospital, including reverse discrimination on the basis of race, hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and retaliation in violation of Title VII.
Underhill said Taylor, a nurse coordinator for the neuro-oncology team, failed to prove any of her claims. Taylor, the judge wrote in his 24-page ruling on Tuesday, had in fact been disciplined and supervisors had spoken to her about alleged ongoing demeaning comments she allegedly made toward her peers.
Underhill's ruling contains a litany of alleged bad conduct and behavior on the part of Taylor, who was suspended on at least two occasions before being fired from the hospital in March 2016.
Several of Taylor's alleged remarks were racially tinged, including one instance where she allegedly used the N-word about a biracial clinical secretary. Two black nurses' aides also reported that Taylor made racist remarks around them.
While still employed at Yale, Taylor “revealed a pattern of inappropriate and unprofessional behavior,” the hospital's senior employee relations specialist wrote as part of an investigation. Taylor's year-end employee evaluation in 2015 included the following statement, according to Underhill: “She does not consistently display or demonstrate respect, empathy, enthusiasm and interest in the needs of others.”
At one point, Taylor allegedly told a secretary that a specific patient “just needs to die,” while also telling that secretary, “Your job sucks.”
For her part, Taylor alleges she was a victim of reverse discrimination and claimed that Khalia Fisher, to whom she reportedly used the N-word, retaliated against her and intentionally withheld new patient referrals and essential patient information. Taylor denied using the slur at Fisher.
In her lawsuit, Taylor wrote: “Plaintiff was disciplined several times and ultimately terminated because YNHH deliberately favored an African-American employee over plaintiff, a caucasian employee, solely because of race.”
Taylor also alleged in her suit that most of the comments attributed to her were lies and that Yale management ignored her claims that Fisher had allegedly retaliated against her.
“On Nov. 5, 2015, YNHH suspended plaintiff without pay, immediately siding with an African-American employee, without a proper investigation. … As a result of the defendant's unlawful conduct, plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer damages, including but not limited to, substantial lost wages, fringe benefits, health insurance, retirement and pension benefits, mental and emotional distress and the ability to enjoy life's pleasures,” Taylor's lawsuit said.
Representing Yale New Haven Hospital are three Wiggin and Dana attorneys: Mary Gambardella, Christine Wachter and Caroline Park.
“The ruling is a reminder for employers of the importance of ongoing and documented performance management procedures, as well as comprehensive internal investigations. Our client is of course pleased with the result,” the firm wrote in a statement Wednesday.
Representing Taylor are Eugene Axelrod and Michael McMinn, both with Woodbridge-based Axelrod & Associates. Neither attorney responded to a request for comment Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readDon't Rush to Change That Noncompete Just Yet, Employment Lawyers Advise
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250