Connecticut AG Says ICE Is Failing to Recognize State's Pardon Laws in Deportation Fight
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement can deport immigrants who have criminal records, but supporters of Wayzaro Walton say the Connecticut woman has a clean slate after the state issued her a full pardon.
March 29, 2019 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
|
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong Friday filed an amicus brief in support of a Hartford woman facing deportation over her pardoned criminal record.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement can deport immigrants who have criminal records, but supporters say Wayzaro Walton has a clean slate, which the federal agency has failed to acknowledge.
The issue hinges on Connecticut's delegation of pardon powers to a governor-appointed board, rather than the governor, prompting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to reject the pardon.
But Tong's brief calls out what he referred to as ICE's failure to recognize Connecticut's pardon laws. His brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit supports Walton's emergency motion to stay her removal from the U.S.
Walton is a British citizen married to an American. She has lived in the U.S. since she was 4 years old, and also has a daughter with American citizenship. She faces deportation over a criminal record dating back to 2006 for a felony larceny and misdemeanor conviction for a shoplifting arrest, according to news reports.
|
Click here to read the full brief
But supporters say federal immigration officials are discounting that Connecticut gave Walton a fresh start in January when the state's Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a pardon that took effect Wednesday.
“ICE's incorrect and unconstitutional misinterpretation of how Connecticut's statutory scheme interacts with the Pardon Waiver Clause deeply prejudices Connecticut residents like Ms. Walton,” Tong wrote in his brief. “It means, in violation of Ms. Walton's Fifth Amendment right to equal protection under law, that Ms. Walton faces immediate deportation and separation from her family—while an identically-situated person just across the state line in New York or Massachusetts, pardoned pursuant to state laws that are no more reliable or procedurally fair than those in Connecticut, would be at liberty to remain in this country.”
ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment by deadline.
The brief follows Tong's letter Wednesday to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Hartford field office, seeking Walton's release, pending the outcome of her appeal, and a stay of deportation.
Another high-profile advocate, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, also acted on Walton's behalf. Lamont sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, asking that her agency recognize pardons granted in Connecticut.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readDecisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250