Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sears Over Alleged Faulty Jack That Caused Car to Crush Man
A federal judge is allowing to proceed a lawsuit alleging Sears sold a defective jack stand that caused a car to fall on a man and kill him.
April 01, 2019 at 06:22 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Connecticut has denied a motion by Sears, Roebuck & Co. to dismiss a wrongful death products liability lawsuit stemming from the death of a man crushed by a car while using an allegedly defective Sears' jack stand.
In his March 29 ruling, Judge Jeffrey Meyer denied Sears' effort to disallow expert testimony from a witness for the plaintiff, rejected its motion for summary judgment under the Connecticut Products Liability Act, and was unpersuaded by its claims that there were no grounds for punitive damages. The judge also denied a request to be removed from the lawsuit by Shinn Fu Company of America, but dismissed its parent company, Shinn Fu Corp., as a defendant.
“Mere corporate control through a parent-subsidiary relationship is insufficient to impute a subsidiary's tort liability to its parent,” Meyer wrote.
At issue is the death of Waterford resident Christian Klorczyk Jr., who the lawsuit says died when a defective jack stand he purchased from Sears failed, causing a BMW sedan he was working on in the family garage to fall and crush him.
Klorczyk was a University of Connecticut senior at the time of the 2011 incident. He was home alone at the time, according to the lawsuit.
For its part, Sears denied Klorczyk was using the company jack stand. It argued that even if Klorczyk had used its product, the stand was not defective. It drove the point home in court papers, reiterating there was no proof that the jack was defective.
Representing the defendants are Dennis Brown and Steven Zakrzewski of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani; Peter Garvey of Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney; and Erica Todd of Trotta, Trotta & Trotta. Zakrzewski declined to comment Monday and the other attorneys did not respond to a request for comment by press time.
The type of device that was holding up the vehicle before it fell on Klorczyk became central to the dispute. The family maintains he was using a single model 50163 Sears jack stand, but the defense disputes that, arguing that Klorczyk never used its jack that day.
Experts played a major role in Meyer's ruling. The judge denied the company's attempt to disallow testimony from Frederick Heath, the plaintiff's expert. Heath's initial report concluded the most likely explanation for the incident was that the jack stand had experienced a phenomenon known as “false engagement.” When false engagement occurs, the ratchet bar and locking pawl or stopper are much less secure and an outside force can cause the ratchet bar to slip out of place and collapse back into the base, allowing anything the ratchet bar has lifted to fall.
Sears disputed that claim. Its expert, James Sprague, said that instead of a jack stand failure taking place, the victim lifted the car only on the floor jack, from which the car slipped and fell, leaving scrape marks along the vehicle's side.
In allowing Heath's testimony to stand, Meyer noted that Sears had maintained Heath had no relevant qualifications to testify because he had no experience in accident reconstruction and was only a paid witness.
“While Heath has a mechanical engineering degree, his curriculum vitae does not show any formal biomechanical training,” Meyer wrote. “All the same, experts do not necessarily need a formal degree in a discipline to be qualified to testify about it.” Heath, the judge wrote, spent 20 years providing consulting engineering and expert testimony. That led Meyer to conclude he was qualified.
In his ruling, Meyer also noted a former Shinn Fu Company of America employee said the group investigated other incidents involving its jack stands.
The judge also wrote: “A jury could reasonably find that defendants consciously ignored the jack stand's risks.”
Howard Riefs, Sears' director of corporate communications, did not respond to a request for comment Monday.
Representing Klorczyk's family are: Kaitlin Canty, Bryan Orticelli and Paul Williams of Day Pitney; and Howard Edinburgh and Michael Gallub of Herzfeld & Rubin. Canty did not get back with a comment by press time. Williams, Edinburgh and Gallub declined to comment and Orticelli did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow May US Judges Vet Experts for Jurors? The New Evidence Rule Set to Take Effect Is Sparking Debate
5 minute readHow Lawyers Are Already Wielding Upcoming Changes to Expert Evidence Rules
6 minute readState Supreme Court Faces Questions on Cellphone Data, Risk of Injury Statute in 7th Term Set to Begin Tuesday
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 2Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 3Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 4When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.