Plan for Civil Rights Division in AG's Office Passes First Hurdle; Final Approval Expected
Legislation to strengthen civil rights enforcement in Connecticut passed the Judiciary Committee this week. The state House and Senate and, ultimately Gov. Ned Lamont, are expected to approve the measure.
April 10, 2019 at 04:36 PM
4 minute read
The creation of a civil rights division within the Office of the Connecticut Attorney General moved one step closer to reality this week when the state Legislature's Judiciary Committee approved the measure 24-15.
The state House and Senate are expected to sign off on the legislation, which Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont is expected to sign into law this session, which ends June 5.
More than 20 states, including New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts, have civil rights divisions within their attorney general's offices. Creating such an agency was a cornerstone of William Tong's campaign when he ran for attorney general last year. Now that he has won the job, Tong told the Connecticut Law Tribune Wednesday that such a division is needed more than ever.
“I think everyone understands that our civil rights are under attack in a profound and never-before-seen way, that people are continuing to suffer various forms of discrimination and violations of their civil rights, whether that be from violation of their civil rights, or from housing discrimination to gender, race, religion and gender identity,” Tong said. “There are so many people discriminated against on a daily basis at work and in their communities.”
The new division, which would expand the powers of the office of the attorney general, would work hand-in-hand with the state's Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, which receives discrimination complaints and investigates them.
But Tong said, “there is a huge enforcement gap.”
“We have strong civil rights laws here in Connecticut, but those rights do not mean anything if there is no remedy,” he said. “That's where I would come in. We would be stepping in with the enforcement muscle to vindicate the rights of people across Connecticut.”
Under House Bill 7222, the office would be able to proactively investigate and litigate in state and federal court when there are civil rights violations. The bill would also allow the office to bring civil suits on behalf of victims, and seek damages of up to $10,000 per violation.
The state would step in, Tong said, “when there is a clear interest to step in.”
“We will not be representing individuals as their lawyers, but rather asserting the interest of the state and protecting all of our citizens,” the attorney general said.
Most of those who spoke on the proposed legislation during a public hearing last month were in favor of the creation of the proposed civil rights division.
But opponents included the National Federation of Independent Business, which advocates on behalf of small and independent business owners.
“NFIB is concerned that the bill, as currently drafted, is too broad and could potentially result in costly new civil investigations, litigation, and/or enforcement actions being brought against small business owners by the Office of Attorney General for an allegation of violation of any state or federal law,” Andy Markowski, the group's state director in Connecticut, wrote. “After all, just one frivolous lawsuit can force a small business to close its doors forever.”
Tong disagrees, and said the venture would have the support of the business community.
“I believe small and large businesses across Connecticut support strong civil rights enforcement because civil rights violations and not respecting the civil rights of consumers and employees is inefficient and bad for business,” Tong said. “I'd think that all businesses would want to root out the bad actors.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Sinks Goodwin's Request for New Trial After Jury Sides With Boston Police in Wrongful-Death Suit
6 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250