Connecticut's Heavy Hitters Go to Bat in Bid to Stop Wayzaro Walton's Deportation
The future of Hartford resident Wayzaro Walton is not clear, as ICE is seeking to deport her. Supporters in Connecticut are fighting any efforts to have her deported to England, where she lived up to the age of 4 before moving to the United States.
April 11, 2019 at 02:26 PM
4 minute read
As Connecticut resident Wayzaro Walton sits in a Massachusetts detention center waiting to see if she'll be deported to England, many notable lawmakers and officials have asked federal authorities to stop the process, let her return to Connecticut and remain in the Nutmeg State.
Connecticut Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin are among officials and political leaders advocating for Walton, who faces deportation over her state-pardoned criminal record.
Related story: Connecticut AG Says ICE Is Failing to Recognize State's Pardon Laws in Deportation Fight
Tuesday afternoon Tong and Walton's attorney, Erin O'Neil-Baker, spearheaded a well-attended press conference focused on where her case stands and what still needs to be done.
Connecticut pardoned Walton, who moved to the United States from England when she was 4 years old, for felony shoplifting and five misdemeanor convictions, all for sixth-degree larceny. The issue gets complicated because the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement only recognizes pardons made directly by state governors. In Connecticut, a board that the governor appoints issues pardons. ICE has not recognized that pardon, and is continuing deportation proceedings against Walton. The agency has made three attempts since 2012 to deport Walton, 34, who is married and has a 15-year-old American daughter.
On Monday evening, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City granted a stay of deportation. The court did not address Walton's release from the ICE detention center, where she has been held since March 26.
“Right now, our next step is to request and demand Wayzaro's release from Massachusetts while we have this temporary stay,” said O'Neil-Baker, a partner with the Hartford Legal Group. “Our ultimate goal is to have her removal orders to England reopened. I am optimistic that will happen. We have very strong legal arguments and that is that those convictions have been fully and completely pardoned. There is no longer any basis for her removal order.”
Tong echoed those sentiments.
“ICE has taken the position that because it's not a pardon from the governor directly, it does not count,” Tong told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “That is ridiculous because Connecticut has every right as a sovereign state to determine how its pardon power is exercised. This is a part of immigration enforcement that I can't make heads or tails of. There is no reason why she should be targeted for deportation. There is nothing about her that is screaming deportation.”
The next step, O-Neil-Baker said, is to get the Virginia-based Board of Immigration Appeals to reopen the removal order.
“I expect to hear from the board in 30 days,” O-Neil-Baker said.
Either side could appeal the board's decision to the Second Circuit of Appeals again, which would make the final decision.
In a statement emailed Thursday to the Connecticut Law Tribune, an ICE representative wrote that Walton is “an unlawfully present citizen of the United Kingdom with a final order of removal issued by an immigration judge.”
“Subsequent appeals of the immigration judge's decision were dismissed,” the statement continued. “Walton is a convicted felon with numerous additional misdemeanor convictions.”
O'Neil-Baker said she talks by phone to Walton on a daily basis.
“She is so grateful for the support from all over, but she really just wants to get home,” her attorney said. “She misses her daughter and wife. Some days her spirits are low and she is afraid of being deported. She is not in any fear of her safety in England, but she has not been there since she was 4 years old, and has no connection with the country.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Patent Disputes Over SharkNinja, Dyson Products Nearing Resolution
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250