Middletown Man Settles Workers' Compensation Claim for $2 Million After Brain Injury
Meghan Woods, the Middletown-based attorney representing truck driver Jairo Solis, argued that her client qualified for coverage under an exception that covers workers responding to emergency requests from their employers.
April 11, 2019 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
A 35-year-old man who suffered a traumatic brain injury after a one-car crash on an icy road in 2013 has settled his workers' compensation claim with the city of Middletown for $2 million.
Attorneys for public works department truck driver Jairo Solis and the city negotiated for several years before agreeing on the settlement April 2. The two sides differed strongly on the “coming and going rule” within the workers' compensation guidelines, which stalled negotiations several times.
The rule says the workers' compensation program does not cover city employees, except police officers and firefighters, who sustain injuries going to or from work. But Solis' Middletown-based attorney Meghan Woods argued her client fell under an exception to the rule. The emergency-call exception says that if an employee is called into work to respond to an emergency from their employer, then that qualifies under the workers' compensation plan.
Solis was called into work for an emergency related to snow and ice on the roads, but the city argued he didn't have to accept the request to come in, as it was not mandatory.
The Connecticut Appellate Court was slated to hear oral arguments in the case next month. But Woods, a partner with Vargas Chapman Woods, said she believed the city agreed to the $2 million settlement because it realized it would have lost in court.
“They acknowledged we had a very high level of prevailing at the appellate level,” Woods told the Connecticut Law Tribune Thursday.
Zachary Delaney of Glastonbury-based Pomeranz, Drayton & Stabnick, represented Middletown. He did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Woods said the last offer the city made was for about $1.6 million. Even though Woods had asked for $3.69 million, she said she was satisfied with the ultimate settlement.
“I don't feel we compromised anything,” she said.
Solis earned about $52,000 annually, Woods said.
Attorneys factored in indemnity by calculating how much Solis would have earned for the rest of his projected natural life. At $52,000 annually, they arrived at about $1.1 million. They estimated medical expenses of more than $900,000. In the end, they agreed on a $2 million lump-sum payment.
“He is getting the money upfront, rather than having to wait to get $600 a week for the rest of his life,” she said.
Woods said Solis, who is in a wheelchair but is not paralyzed, “is happy to be done with this.”
“It was six years ago and he is happy to be moving forward and on with his life,” she said.
Solis, a Middletown resident who lives with his parents, has movement impairment, speech difficulties and other lasting effects of the traumatic brain injury, his attorney said.
“He needs assistance with things like making meals and showering. He also can't drive, but he is independent,” Woods said.
The money was disbursed to Solis this week, Woods said. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, a special-needs trust in Solis' name will be set up with the funds.
Woods said, “That will allow him to better utilize that money.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Look to Consolidate Manhattan Tolling Program Cases in Federal Court
5 minute readConnecticut Supreme Court Rejects Businesses' Claim Vehicle Tax Law Unconstitutional
2 minute readAttorneys Fight Over Last Chance to Examine Norfolk Southern Derailment Site
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250