Suit Claims Cheshire Academy Expelled Student Over His Conservative Political Views
Parents of student Michael Mancini allege the Connecticut boarding school was not tolerant of their son's conservative viewpoints. They allege Cheshire Academy expelled him after his father launched a website critical of the school.
April 18, 2019 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
A lawsuit filed in Connecticut Superior Court alleges a prestigious boarding school, Cheshire Academy, this week expelled an outspoken sophomore over his conservative political views.
The college preparatory school's associate head, David Dykeman, was served Wednesday with the lawsuit, filed against Cheshire Academy and two top officials: Julie Anderson, head of schools, and Wesley Simon, the dean.
The three-count lawsuit alleges breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation and defamation at the academy that was founded in 1794 and is now one of the oldest boarding schools in the country. Boarding and tuition costs about $62,000 per year, according to information on the school's website.
But the lawsuit alleges fellow students criticized and verbally attacked Michael Mancini, a member of the school's football team, because of his conservative views, which was known among staff and students.
Mancini was expelled from the school on Tuesday, one day after his father, Theodore, unveiled a website chronicling his son's tenure at the school. The site is called “The Real Cheshire Academy” and, according to Mancini's attorney, Jamie Sullivan, the website “soon went viral among the kids at the school and kids from other prep schools.”
“The school also knew that the family has retained an attorney,” said Sullivan, a managing partner at Howard Kohn Sprague & FitzGerald. “I had written a letter threatening a lawsuit.”
Sullivan said in the wake of Mancini's immediate expulsion, his parents would soon be amending the complaint to demand that Cheshire Academy allow him to return to school. The suit also seeks unspecified monetary damages.
Sullivan said Mancini was upfront with his political views when Dykeman, also the school's football coach, recruited him to play football. Mancini, Sullivan said, was promised the school accepted all points of view and was open to a free exchange of ideas. That changed soon after Mancini joined the school as a sophomore in September 2018, Sullivan said.
In one incident outlined in the lawsuit, Mancini made some general observations in an English class at the academy, allegedly prompting several students to yell at him. The class was discussing William Shakespeare's “Twelfth Night” when Mancini stated the play was not historically accurate with regard to a cross-dresser because that behavior was frowned on in England at the time. Some in the class, Sullivan said, thought the reference of Viola, who crossed-dressed as a man, portrayed transgenderism in a positive light.
“Michael was verbally attacked and screamed at by two students for making those comments, for his opinion,” the lawsuit states. After the incident, the lawsuit said, Mancini and his teacher had a conversation on “how to steer clear of language that can upset others.”
In another incident, Mancini was suspended for five days for jokingly answering, “Obviously, I am black” when a teacher asked him in a mandatory Martin Luther King Jr. workshop to tell the class something about his identity. The lawsuit said students of all colors laughed at the comment and that Mancini had apologized several times.
“The school had a close-minded perspective and did not want to embrace a diversity of thought and interpretation,” Sullivan said. Mancini was suspended after the comment about being black “because of his conservative views and his lack of political correctness,” Sullivan said.
No attorney has appeared for the academy, and Dykeman said Thursday, “With Michael being a minor, the school does not have a comment at this time.”
According to Sullivan, the school claimed that one reason for Mancini's expulsion was that he taped some of the disciplinary proceedings against him.
The attorney said he has been told that dozens of Mancini's supporters, fellow students at the school, will be staging a walkout at the academy soon.
Sullivan said, “He has the support of all of the football players, and that includes white and black players.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readFederal Judge Blocks New Hampshire Law Banning Transgender Girls From School Sports
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
- 2Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
- 3How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 4When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 5New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250