Suit Claims Cheshire Academy Expelled Student Over His Conservative Political Views
Parents of student Michael Mancini allege the Connecticut boarding school was not tolerant of their son's conservative viewpoints. They allege Cheshire Academy expelled him after his father launched a website critical of the school.
April 18, 2019 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
A lawsuit filed in Connecticut Superior Court alleges a prestigious boarding school, Cheshire Academy, this week expelled an outspoken sophomore over his conservative political views.
The college preparatory school's associate head, David Dykeman, was served Wednesday with the lawsuit, filed against Cheshire Academy and two top officials: Julie Anderson, head of schools, and Wesley Simon, the dean.
The three-count lawsuit alleges breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation and defamation at the academy that was founded in 1794 and is now one of the oldest boarding schools in the country. Boarding and tuition costs about $62,000 per year, according to information on the school's website.
But the lawsuit alleges fellow students criticized and verbally attacked Michael Mancini, a member of the school's football team, because of his conservative views, which was known among staff and students.
Mancini was expelled from the school on Tuesday, one day after his father, Theodore, unveiled a website chronicling his son's tenure at the school. The site is called “The Real Cheshire Academy” and, according to Mancini's attorney, Jamie Sullivan, the website “soon went viral among the kids at the school and kids from other prep schools.”
“The school also knew that the family has retained an attorney,” said Sullivan, a managing partner at Howard Kohn Sprague & FitzGerald. “I had written a letter threatening a lawsuit.”
Sullivan said in the wake of Mancini's immediate expulsion, his parents would soon be amending the complaint to demand that Cheshire Academy allow him to return to school. The suit also seeks unspecified monetary damages.
Sullivan said Mancini was upfront with his political views when Dykeman, also the school's football coach, recruited him to play football. Mancini, Sullivan said, was promised the school accepted all points of view and was open to a free exchange of ideas. That changed soon after Mancini joined the school as a sophomore in September 2018, Sullivan said.
In one incident outlined in the lawsuit, Mancini made some general observations in an English class at the academy, allegedly prompting several students to yell at him. The class was discussing William Shakespeare's “Twelfth Night” when Mancini stated the play was not historically accurate with regard to a cross-dresser because that behavior was frowned on in England at the time. Some in the class, Sullivan said, thought the reference of Viola, who crossed-dressed as a man, portrayed transgenderism in a positive light.
“Michael was verbally attacked and screamed at by two students for making those comments, for his opinion,” the lawsuit states. After the incident, the lawsuit said, Mancini and his teacher had a conversation on “how to steer clear of language that can upset others.”
In another incident, Mancini was suspended for five days for jokingly answering, “Obviously, I am black” when a teacher asked him in a mandatory Martin Luther King Jr. workshop to tell the class something about his identity. The lawsuit said students of all colors laughed at the comment and that Mancini had apologized several times.
“The school had a close-minded perspective and did not want to embrace a diversity of thought and interpretation,” Sullivan said. Mancini was suspended after the comment about being black “because of his conservative views and his lack of political correctness,” Sullivan said.
No attorney has appeared for the academy, and Dykeman said Thursday, “With Michael being a minor, the school does not have a comment at this time.”
According to Sullivan, the school claimed that one reason for Mancini's expulsion was that he taped some of the disciplinary proceedings against him.
The attorney said he has been told that dozens of Mancini's supporters, fellow students at the school, will be staging a walkout at the academy soon.
Sullivan said, “He has the support of all of the football players, and that includes white and black players.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250