Class Action Filed Against Outback Steakhouse for Allegedly Underpaying Servers
Florida-based Outback Steakhouse chain has been hit with a prospective class action, alleging it underpaid its servers at nine Connecticut locations.
April 22, 2019 at 04:35 PM
3 minute read
A prospective class action lawsuit that affects hundreds of servers at nine Outback Steakhouse restaurants in Connecticut claims the chain did not pay employees the full minimum wage for performing nonservice duties.
The lawsuit, which was filed April 18 in Hartford Superior Court against the Florida-based chain, alleges servers at the Connecticut Outbacks regularly performed 30 to 60 minutes of nonservice work each day, but were paid $6.38 an hour for it. The state allows for a $6.38 minimum wage for service duties, such as waiting tables, because restaurant workers can make up the difference in tips. The lawsuit, though, alleges those same employees should have been getting the state's $10.10 minimum wage for nonservice work, such as general cleaning and stocking duties.
Hartford-based Hayber Law Firm filed suit on behalf of former Newington server Ryan Reutenauer, who worked for the eatery from February to June 2017. Richard Hayber says the restaurant owes Reutenauer “several thousands of dollars.”
The class covers hundreds of servers who have worked at any of the nine Connecticut restaurants since April 4, 2017.
“We are taking about hundreds of thousands of dollars per restaurant. That is my educated guess, although we will have the exact number through discovery,” Hayber said Monday.
The defendants are Outback Steakhouse of Florida LLC, its parent company Bloomin' Brands Inc., and OSI Restaurants Partners LLC, a sister company to Outback and a wholly owned subsidiary of Bloomin' Brands. All three companies are based in Tampa, Florida.
As of Monday afternoon, the defendants had not assigned an attorney to represent them in the lawsuit. Neither Bloomin' Brands spokeswoman, Cathie Koch, nor its chief legal officer, Joseph Kadow, responded to requests for comments Monday.
Hayber said it's up to out-of-state corporations to be up-to-date on the wage laws of the states in which they do business. He said the defendants in this case were not.
“National corporations that come into our state and hire minimum-wage workers have to read our laws and obey them, and these laws are well documented,” Hayber said. “They [minimum wage laws] are supposed to be written on a poster, required to be hung in the restaurants.” Hayber said he will learn via discovery whether those posters were ever put up in the Outback restaurants in question.
Connecticut law, Hayber said, also states that if employers do not differentiate service work hours and nonservice work hours, then the employee is entitled to collect on the full $10.10 minimum wage for all hours worked. “The law is very strict in this regard,” he said.
“I believe that lawsuits on behalf of minimum wage workers are some of the most important lawsuits our court system can handle,” Hayber said. “These workers are really the most vulnerable people in our economy. They are typically young and have the least resources and knowledge of the laws.”
The lawsuit seeks certification as a class and monetary damages for unpaid wages.
Assisting Hayber is colleague Thomas Durkin.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readProgressive Hit With Class Action After Allegedly Unlawfully Denying Collision Coverage
3 minute read$2.8B Antitrust Settlement Will Have Long-Term Impacts on Insurance Industry, Say Attorneys Behind Accord
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250