Ex-Bristol Lawyer Sentenced to 46 Months in Prison for Defrauding Wards of the Court
Prosecutors said former attorney Jodi Zils Gagne used her position as an officer of the court to help herself to $169,000 belonging to people under the court's protection.
April 23, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
A former Bristol attorney and town councilor was sentenced to 46 months in prison Tuesday for stealing more than $169,000 from clients while she served as a court-appointed conservator.
Probate courts appoint conservators to oversee the financial or personal affairs of adults incapable of managing their finances or personal care. But according to authorities, 43-year-old Jodi Zils Gagne used that position to help herself to the wards' assets.
Prosecutors said Zils Gagne defrauded several people under the court's protection, including a client older than 90 and another who had multiple sclerosis. They say she also misappropriated their money and overbilled them.
In addition to the prison time, Zils Gagne's sentence includes three years of supervised release. She was released on $50,000 bond and ordered to report to prison on July 8.
Authorities said Zils Gagne, who pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud, misappropriated money that was intended for clients' medical care, housing, other bills and personal expenses.
In one case, prosecutors said Zils Gagne defrauded a victim of $130,000. Authorities said she took $113,000 of that money under the guise of an investment when, in fact, it was a 10-year-old note that paid only a prime rate and was signed between her husband and her, as the victim's conservator. The money, authorities said, was used to fund her husband's startup internet radio station in Bristol.
Zils Gagne, the government said, also misrepresented, or failed to disclose, material facts about her conservatorship activities to the Bristol probate court and others between May 2015 and February 2018.
The government said in court papers that Zils Gagne, an attorney for 16 years, fraudulently obtained and converted money and property from her victims through, among other means, commingling the victims' money with each other and her husband's business and personal funds. Authorities say Zils Gagne misappropriated her victims' money for her own personal use and enrichment, overbilled for conservator fees, and made materially false and fraudulent representations and omissions to the Bristol probate court and to at least one successor conservator concerning the use and expenditure of the victims' money.
Zils Gagne's attorney, Francis O'Reilly of Southport-based O'Reilly & Shaw, did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. But her March 28 memorandum in aid of sentencing argued that Zils Gagne had done a lot of good work in the community and therefore deserved home confinement.
The memo stated the former attorney has a “lack of prior incarceration, family responsibilities, history of physical and mental health concerns, cooperation with federal authorities regarding her own criminal conduct and that of others, and prior good works in the community.” It asked for a sentence of one-year home confinement, which would allow for Zils Gagne to “address her physical and mental health concerns in a less-restrictive environment.”
The government, in its April 2 sentencing memorandum, saw things differently.
“Ms. Zils Gagne abused her position of trust as a conservator and an attorney to prey on some of the most vulnerable victims in our society, the elderly and the infirm, to steal nearly $170,000 to benefit herself,” the memo states. “She stole their money, overbilled them for fictitious services, profited from the sale of their homes, engaged in self-dealing, and papered over a sweetheart loan for her husband's start-up business, which soon failed.”
The memo continues: “When questioned by other attorneys and the probate court, Ms. Zils Gagne repeatedly lied, including under oath, to prevent the full truth from coming out.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250