Hartford Attorney Sentenced to 8 Months' Imprisonment for Filing False Tax Returns
A federal judge late Wednesday sentenced Hartford attorney Justin Freeman to eight months in prison for tax evasion. Freeman had faced upward of three years' imprisonment.
May 01, 2019 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
A Hartford-based attorney specializing in family law, personal injury and criminal defense was sentenced late Wednesday afternoon to eight months' imprisonment and one year of supervised release for filing false tax returns that omitted more than $1.2 million in income.
Judge Kari Dooley of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut also ordered Justin Freeman to pay a $4,000 fine. Freeman was released on a $100,000 bond and is required to report to prison on July 1.
The government said Freeman lived a lavish lifestyle with money that should have gone to the Internal Revenue Service. Among other things, the government said, Freeman owned three houses, a boat and six luxury cars.
Freeman, 47, a Manchester resident, faced a maximum of three years in prison and a fine of up to $840,000.
Freeman, who the Statewide Grievance Committee put on interim suspension in February, pleaded guilty to a federal tax charge: one count of filing a false tax return. He paid $419,259 in back taxes and agreed to cooperate with the IRS to pay all outstanding taxes, interest and penalties.
Freeman, whose website describes his practice as “real-world law for real-world people,” ran The Law Office of Justin C. Freeman.
According to the November plea agreement between the government and Freeman, the attorney reported $476,228 in total income for 2010, but actually earned $860,041. For 2011, he reported $410,002 in total income while earning nearly $1.1 million, and in 2012, the government said, he reported $529,673 but took in $696,559.
Representing Freeman is James Cowdery of Hartford-based Cowdery & Murphy. Cowdery did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
According to the plea agreement, Freeman waived his right to be indicted when he pleaded guilty. He also agreed to say he signed, under penalty of perjury, a 1040 IRS form that he caused his tax preparer to prepare and file with the IRS.
“Freeman signed those tax returns and caused them to be filed with the IRS willfully, that is, with the specific intent to violate the tax laws,” the plea agreement stated.
In the defendant's April 17 memorandum in aid of sentencing, his attorneys recommended a sentence of one-year probation, including a term of six months of home confinement.
In asking for that sentence, the memorandum notes that Freeman “has accepted responsibility for his conduct and has worked extremely hard to make things right.”
“Even before entering his plea, Mr. Freeman executed the necessary IRS documents to assess the taxes, penalties and interest he owed as a result of his offense, and then he fully paid the taxes due—$419,259, which is the agreed-upon restitution in this case,” the pleading argued.
The defense memorandum also said: “Without question, this case marks the lowest point in Mr. Freeman's life.”
In its April 24 memorandum in aid of sentencing, the government said Freeman enjoyed a charmed life because of his failure to pay taxes.
“He enjoyed the spoils of his considerable success with three personal residences, a Ferrari, Maserati, BMW, Mercedes, two Cadillac Escalades and a boat,” the filing argued. “But Freeman's success was not quite what it seemed. For tax years 2010, 2011 and 2012, Freeman failed to report over $1.2 million in income, and over five consecutive years, engaged in a back and forth with the IRS designed to forestall enforced collection action and avoid paying what he owed.”
The government also said “a term of imprisonment in this case is necessary to disabuse others of the notion that they may ignore (or tactically avoid) their tax obligations and then blame ineptitude, inattention, or their tax professionals for their transgressions.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250