'Abusers Die': Emails Allegedly Show Ex-Purdue Pharma Chief Blaming Victims of Opioid Crisis
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong on Tuesday released an unredacted version of the state's lawsuit against Purdue Pharma over the corporation's alleged role in the opioid crisis. That lawsuit includes emails from 2001 by the company's former chairman, who appears appears to criticize opioid addicts.
May 07, 2019 at 12:45 PM
4 minute read
A new unredacted complaint filed Monday by Connecticut's attorney general against Purdue Pharma companies include emails that allegedly show the the corporation's former chairman and president blaming opioid users for the pharmaceutical drug crisis that has swept the country.
Attorney General William Tong's release Tuesday purportedly reveals previously undisclosed “shocking and offensive emails” from Purdue's former chief, Richard Sackler.
Tong claims the emails from 2001 show “callous disregard” for millions of addicts, as Sackler and his family, which owns Stamford, Connecticut-based Purdue Pharma, allegedly sought “to avoid personal liability through hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent transfers.” Tong also alleged Sackler's “outrageous comments show an utter disregard for human life.”
Purdue Pharma makes painkiller OxyContin and other drugs that have emerged at the center of a national drug overdose crisis. It doesn't dispute the comments in the emails were from an exchange between Sackler and an acquaintance about 18 years ago. But it said in a statement that the “insensitive language in emails doesn't reflect what Dr. Sackler or Purdue actually did about the emerging problem of opioid abuse.”
“Dr. Sackler has apologized for using insensitive language that doesn't reflect what he actually did. These emails were written two decades ago following news reports about criminal activity involving prescription opioids, such as drug store robberies,” the company statement continues. “Dr. Sackler was expressing his worry that this news coverage would stigmatize an essential FDA-approved medication that doctors feel is critical for treating their patients in pain. The same concern from 20 years ago exists today. The growing abuse of illicit fentanyl and heroin smuggled from China is now interfering with patient access to important legal medication.”
In one email, the acquaintance tells Sackler, “Abusers die. Well that is the choice they made. I doubt a single one didn't know of the risks.”
In response, Sackler says: “Abusers aren't victims; they are the victimizers.”
In the second email with the same acquaintance, Sackler responds to comments the acquaintance made about people unfairly blaming drug manufacturers for the opioid crisis. “Unfortunately, when I'm ambushed by 60 Minutes, I can't easily get this concept across,” Sackler wrote. “Calling drug addicts 'scum of the earth' will guarantee that I become the poster child for liberals who want to do just want (sic) to distribute the blame to someone else, as you say.”
Those comments, Tong said in a press release Tuesday “are far more than a momentary lapse in judgment between friends.”
“They encapsulate the depraved indifference to human suffering that infected Purdue's entire business model,” he said. “Purdue and defendant members of the Sackler family knew people were dying, but they continued to push their opioids in blind pursuit of profit. Purdue and the Sacklers must be held accountable.”
According to Tong's office, parts of the complaint were initially redacted pursuant to an order that a federal judge issued requiring the information be kept confidential unless the producing party agrees the information can be disclosed. Connecticut has since obtained an agreement to release communications that were previously redacted.
Former Attorney General George Jepsen filed the initial lawsuit in December 2018, alleging the company misled doctors and others on the addictiveness of opioids. The initial complaint seeks damages, civil penalties, restitution and permanent injunctive relief. Tong expanded the action, amending the lawsuit to add a fifth count: fraudulent transfer.
The suit, which names 21 individuals and corporate entities, alleges that several Sackler-controlled companies fraudulently transferred hundreds of millions of dollars from Purdue Pharma to the Sacklers to evade liability and accountability related to the opioid epidemic.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 2Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 3Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 4Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 5USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250