Case to Proceed Against Bristol Hospital, Surgeon Accused of Sex Assault
A federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit alleging sexual assault by a surgeon against an employee who was also a patient can move forward. Judge Stefan Underhill denied Dr. Olakunle Oluwole's request to set aside a default judgment against him.
May 09, 2019 at 01:55 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge has ruled against setting aside a default judgement against a surgeon who was accused of sexually assaulting an employee and patient at Bristol Hospital.
Dr. Olakunle Oluwole had maintained in a request to set aside the default judgment that he was never properly served with the lawsuit that Laura Henry filed against him. He did not answer the lawsuit, leading to a ruling in Henry's favor.
In a five-page ruling responding to Oluwole's challenge, U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill let the judgment stand.
“There is evidence suggesting that Dr. Oluwole's default was willful and that setting aside the default judgment would prejudice Henry,” the judge wrote.
In Oluwole's case, state marshals attempted numerous times in early-to-mid-2014 to deliver the summons to his new job in Albany, New York, and to his home in Rochester, New York. There was never a response.
Oluwole later claimed he did not become aware of the lawsuit until October 2017 when he attempted to reinstate his New York and Connecticut medical licenses.
The judge, however, noted there is evidence “suggesting that Dr. Oluwole had actual notice of the claims pending against him and chose not to answer.” That evidence, Underhill wrote, included the doctor allegedly contacting Henry on Facebook and admitting he “couldn't face (her) in court.”
In July 2018, the doctor filed a motion asking the court to reconsider the default judgment. If Underhill had granted Oluwole's request, it would have meant that the lawsuit, which was filed against both Bristol Hospital and the doctor, would have had to start from the beginning as far as discovery and depositions—at least with regard to the suit against the doctor.
“When someone files a complaint against you, you just can't ignore it,” said Hartford solo practitioner Richard Gordon, who is representing Henry. “You have to answer, or you have to challenge the court's jurisdiction. He did neither.”
Henry, according to her lawsuit, was working as a surgical services associate at Bristol Hospital when she claimed Oluwole sexually assaulted her at the hospital, first grabbing her in the entrance to his office and then forcing her to perform oral sex. In addition to being a hospital employee, Henry became a patient of Oluwole's related to a lap band procedure. The assault allegedly occurred, according to the lawsuit, when she entered his office to discuss the procedure. Henry alleges the doctor grabbed her in the doorway and attempted to kiss her. Later, while performing a medical procedure, the lawsuit says, the doctor “brutally and violently grabbed her hair” and forced her to perform oral sex.
Bristol Hospital Multi-Specialty Group employed Oluwole, who had staff privileges to practice at Bristol Hospital. He was eventually fired.
Bristol Hospital has maintained in court papers that because the doctor was not technically its employee, it should be exempt from the lawsuit.
Hospital spokesman Chris Boyle declined to comment Thursday because the matter is pending.
Oluwole, who now lives in New Jersey, has an unlisted telephone number and could not be reached. His attorney, John Costa of Ryan Ryan DeLuca, did not respond to a request for comment.
Representing Bristol Hospital are Jackson Lewis attorneys James Shea and Sara Simeonidis and Ashley Totorica of Stamford's Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart. Shea was on vacation and not available for comment. Simeonidis and Totorica did not respond to requests for comment.
Oluwole was never criminally charged. Gordon told the Connecticut Law Tribune on Thursday police felt they needed more information before they pressed charges. In addition, Gordon said, he was with Henry when she was talking to the police and suffered a “catastrophic stroke” during the interviewing process, “due to stress.”
Today, according to Gordon, Henry has blood clots in her leg and neck, a stent in her neck and a device implanted in her brain to keep her alive.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250