Actor-Turned-Connecticut Attorney Sues Conagra Over Exploding Cooking Spray Cans
Attorneys with Bridgeport-based Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder hit packaged food giant Conagra with six separate lawsuits, alleging the spray cans made by the company have exploded and caused injuries.
May 10, 2019 at 01:38 PM
5 minute read
A former actor who's now a litigator with Bridgeport-based Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder is leading the litigation against packaged food giant Conagra, alleging the company's cooking sprays, including Pam, are dangerous and have caused injuries by exploding.
Connecticut attorney J. Craig Smith filed six separate lawsuits against the makers of Pam and other cooking sprays Tuesday in Chicago, where Conagra is headquartered. His filings name Conagra Foods Inc. and Conagra Brands Inc. as defendants.
The lawsuits have put the 48-year-old Georgia native in the spotlight. Or back in the spotlight, because Smith is a former actor who's starred in movies with Martin Sheen and Halle Berry.
Smith, who has been an attorney for 20 years including about 16 years in Connecticut, had a successful career in theater, movies and television with national appearances on stage and in several motion pictures. His roles included the movie “Queen,” which was the sequel to “Roots” and starred Sheen and Berry. He also appeared on television shows, including “In The Heat of the Night,” a drama series about a police chief.
Smith graduated from the University of South Carolina School of Law, Columbia, in 1999. He is licensed in Georgia, South Carolina and Connecticut, where he has worked the past 15 years for Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder. He is an experienced litigator with an emphasis on personal injury, products liability, complex litigation and civil rights cases.
Smith told the Connecticut Law Tribune on Friday he has been swamped with calls since he filed the lawsuits Tuesday. “There were at least 20 cases of burns I knew of, but this week I have heard from at least double that amount of people who say they were injured. Even fire departments have been reaching out to me.”
The six lawsuits were filed on behalf individuals from five states who say they were injured when the spray cans exploded. Conagra began using a new aerosol-can design in 2011, which Smith says is at the heart of the controversy. The new design includes a venting mechanism on the bottom of the can intended to allow the container to vent its flammable contents in a controlled manner. Instead, Smith said, the cans, which the company stopped making earlier this year, “are faulty, dangerous and prone to explosion.”
Among the plaintiffs Smith represents is Maria Mariani, a Staten Island, New York, resident.
“She suffered life-altering injuries,” Smith said. “She was burned on more than 20% of her body. She got out of the hospital on Monday and has had a number of surgeries and skin grafts. She is still being treated on a daily basis.”
Even though the spray cans in question, which are sold under various names, were discontinued early this year, Smith said they are still on store shelves and in people's homes.
A recall is needed, he said.
“They know where the cans are and who bought them and can track them,” Smith said. “Issuing a nationwide recall will often frighten people, those that want to be their customers. And giving back cans can be expensive. I imagine at $3 to $4 a can, it could be in the millions of dollars.”
It was unclear how much plaintiffs would seek in damages, because Smith said each case is different and the amount of compensation sought would vary.
Representing Conagra is attorney Mary Young of Blackwell Burke, the company's national counsel, who said she'd have to consult with her client before commenting, but had not done so by press time.
Meanwhile, Conagra's marketing team emailed a statement Friday to the Connecticut Law Tribune.
“When PAM is used correctly, as instructed, it is a 100% safe and effective product,” company spokesman Daniel Hare said. “PAM cooking sprays is used safely and properly by millions of people several times a day, every single day. … All PAM cooking sprays include large, clear instructions, warnings and cautions on both the front and back of the packaging alerting consumers that the product should be used responsibly as it is flammable, and that it should not be left on a stove or near a heat source, should not be sprayed near an open flame, and should not be stored about 120 degrees.”
But since the news of the lawsuits hit, Smith said he's been investigating “new claims which have injuries ranging from comas to people with burns on 20 to 30% of their bodies.”
“We are talking all kinds of surgeries and all kinds of skin grafts,” he said.
Also representing the plaintiffs in four of the six lawsuits is Joseph Lyon of The Lyon Firm in Cincinnati. Along with Smith, representing the plaintiffs in all six lawsuits are Peter Flowers and Frank Cesarone of Chicago-based Meyers & Flowers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readSettlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement
- 2People in the News—Feb. 4, 2025—McGuireWoods, Barley Snyder
- 3Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
- 4Superior Court Re-examines Death of a Party Pending a Divorce Action
- 5Chicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250