Law Firm Sues Johnny Depp Over Alleged Unpaid Bills
The firm claims Depp owes $350,000 for its work representing the Hollywood star in a separate dispute over legal fees.
May 21, 2019 at 06:30 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The law firm Buckley sued actor Johnny Depp on Monday, claiming the star actor failed to pay $348,000 he owes the firm for its work litigating a legal malpractice suit against his previous lawyers.
Buckley said in a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court that it spent a year and a half trying to claw back some $30 million from Depp's former lawyers at Bloom Hergott Diemer Rosenthal LaViolette Feldman Schenkman & Goodman. Depp has accused Bloom Hergott of illegally taking contingency fees without a written agreement.
After racking up half-a-million dollars in fees and notching a key victory on Depp's behalf last August, Buckley said it withdrew from the case in January after Depp decided to trim the number of law firms on his payroll. That left three other firms representing him, court records indicate—Brown Rudnick, the Endeavor Law Firm and Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner.
Buckley said in Monday's suit that Depp already paid over $180,000, adding that his representative Edward White expressed gratitude for the lawyers' work and said the firm would be paid in full. But deadlines came and went, first for the first quarter of this year and then for mid-May, the firm alleged.
“Notwithstanding these expressions, to date defendants have not yet paid plaintiff's outstanding legal fees and costs of $347,919.89,” the complaint said. “As a result of defendants' breach of the engagement agreement, plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of the unpaid legal fees and costs.”
In recent years, Depp has litigated fiercely against both Bloom Hergott and his former financial advisers at The Management Group. While TMG settled with Depp last year, both defendants have said Depp's profligate spending—not their fees—are to blame for his financial troubles, which they said were more significant than one might expect for an actor who commands tens of millions of dollars per film.
In a statement, a Buckley spokesman expressed dissatisfaction over having to sue the firm's ex-client.
“Given the outstanding litigation result we achieved for Mr. Depp last summer, we were disappointed to have to file an action to collect fees he owes us,” the spokesman said.
Benjamin Chew of Brown Rudnick and Adam Waldman of Endeavor Law, two of Depp's lawyers, didn't immediately respond to comment requests Tuesday. Chew brought Depp to Brown Rudnick as a client when he joined the firm from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips last year.
Buckley—known as Buckley Sandler until earlier this year—is representing itself in the case, led by Los Angeles partner John C. Redding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250