CT Attorney's Son Comes Close to Taking Down Historic 'Jeopardy' Champ
Scheffey learned about the champion's aggressive betting strategy while awaiting his turn in the game show's green room and decided an offensive tack would be the only way to have a chance to win. "I decided this was my shot and I was going to take it," he said.
May 30, 2019 at 08:06 PM
3 minute read
The son of a veteran Connecticut attorney became part of television history recently when he appeared on the game show “Jeopardy!” and came within striking distance of defeating famed current champion and winning-streak holder James Holzhauer.
Nathan “Nate” Scheffey, son of Bolton attorney Tom Scheffey, competed on the May 23 episode, scoring an impressive $25,800 in the game. Though the total was not enough to knock Holzhauer off his pedestal (the champ had $31,200 for the day) it marked the second-closest anyone has come to dethroning Holzhauer, who has made national headlines with a 30-game winning streak worth more than $2.3 million.
“It was amazing,” said Scheffey, 37, who grew up in Bolton and now lives in New York City. “I started taking the online test in the fall last year and I got a call to audition in September. I got the callback about four weeks head of time to play in March.”
Since recordings of “Jeopardy!” run weeks ahead of the TV schedule and associated news cycle, Scheffey said he arrived at the show's studio unaware of Holzhauer's now-famous streak. “They film five episodes a day, and there were three games filmed before mine, so that was helpful,” he said. By that time, Scheffey learned insiders were predicting Holzhauer's winnings that day would push his total winnings to more than $2 million. The game would mark Holzhauer's 26th appearance.
Scheffey learned about the champion's aggressive betting strategy while awaiting his turn in the game show's green room and decided an offensive tack would be the only way to have a chance to win. “I decided this was my shot and I was going to take it,” he said.
Scheffey's performance was strong enough to put him ahead of Holzhauer early in the game. “The only regret I had was with the Daily Doubles,” he said. “At the beginning of Double Jeopardy I got the first Daily Double, and I had $13,000 while James had $6,000. It was a pretty good lead, and I wagered $6,000. James probably would have wagered more than that.” The category was science, and Scheffey gave the correct answer.
In the end, Scheffey became the second-most threatening challenger to Holzhauer, missing first place by $5,400. In nail-biter last month, Holzhauer nearly lost his title to Adam Levine of Ashland, Massachusetts, who came up just $18 short.
For Tom Scheffey, who is a member of the Connecticut Law Tribune's editorial board, it was “a marvel” to watch his son compete on the show. “It was scary to have Alex [Trebek, the host] go through all of the facts in the beginning. James had an intimidating record.” Scheffey called his son's performance “real grace under pressure.”
Nate Scheffey said it was his father's intelligence, support and natural curiosity that led him to be a lifelong learner and someone who would take a shot at testing his knowledge on “Jeopardy!”
After the episode aired last Thursday, Holzhauer Tweeted to Scheffey, “Way to bring it, @nscheffey. Don't let the Friday Morning Quarterbacks get you down.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCensorship or Security Measure? TikTok Ban Pits Civil Liberties Groups Against US Officials
After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250