Mayor, Chief Sued Over Allegations 46 Officers Responded to House Party, Beat Guests
In a federal lawsuit filed this week, Bridgeport resident Carmelo Mendez claims several officers who responded to a noise complaint at his sister-in-law's house beat him.
June 04, 2019 at 04:12 PM
4 minute read
A man who says Bridgeport police officers beat him repeatedly after they responded to a noise complaint at his sister-in-law's house during a party for his 12-year-old niece has filed a federal lawsuit against 17 defendants, including the city, police chief and mayor.
According to the 32-page lawsuit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, 46 officers swarmed the home of Wanda Mendez and Fernando Morales following the noise complaint. It says officers responded to a “distress call.” But what occurred next was a massive, unprovoked beating for plaintiff Carmelo Mendez, according to the lawsuit and Robert Berke, a Bridgeport solo practitioner representing Mendez.
“It was pretty horrible,” Berke told the Connecticut Law Tribune Tuesday. “There were a number of officers beating on him, stomping on him, punching him and kicking him all at the same time. Our claim is that, clearly, the officers were not trained properly.”
According to the Connecticut Post newspaper, 17 of the officers on the scene were accused of excessive force and lying on police reports. The paper says the city's Office of Internal Affairs found the officers violated police rules and regulations, including using excessive force on Mendez.
Berke, who is seeking $5 million for Mendez, said his client was videotaping the scene and could be heard yelling “police brutality” after allegedly witnessing a relative being arrested. About 30 people were at the party, Berke said.
“Mr. Mendez is told he can continue videotaping if he does not move and then an officer clocks him out of the blue and they all beat on him,” Berke said, adding that three videos show most of the alleged attack on his client. Mendez took video himself, as did a party guest, plus a surveillance camera from the house provided a third recording.
Mendez's lawsuit claims, “The officers collectively inflicted such a brutal beating that it left a tattoo of multiple quarter-sized marks on his head that resemble a police badge on a ring, and contusions over his body.”
“Our case is fairly strong,” Berke said. “The video is very strong evidence and it shows Mr. Mendez being beaten.”
Berke said Mendez's primary injury is to his left eye, where he had several medical procedures. “He can see, but he has blurriness issues that have not been resolved,” Berke said.
Berke said Mendez did not provoke the beating and never verbally or physically resisted arrest. He said Mendez, a veteran, was lawfully carrying a pistol at the time of the alleged attacks.
Mendez was charged with interfering with police and breach of peace. The charges were dismissed last month.
Berke said he will be filing lawsuits on behalf of the other seven people arrested, after their criminal cases are resolved. “You can't file civil action until all cases are dismissed,” Berke said.
Berke said officers can be seen on Bridgeport police video “joking about” the arrests and the incident. The lawsuit alleges one officer joked how his “hand slipped” and that it “accidentally struck someone in the face.”
A former bail bondsman, Mendez recently got his master's degree in criminal justice from the University of Bridgeport, Berke said.
Police Chief Armando Perez's office referred all comments to police representative Terron James, who declined to comment on the matter.
City Attorney R. Christopher Meyer did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday, while Rowena White, communications director for Mayor Joseph Ganim, did not respond to a request for comment.
Judge Jeffrey Meyer is scheduled to hear the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250