Conn. Spent $63M on Lawsuits, Millions for Lawyers in 2018. Here's Where the Money Went
The state has paid about $42.4 million related to "SEBAC v. Rowland," the most costly litigation expense from the state's coffers. The Connecticut Law Tribune outlines the other expenses that drove litigation-related expenses paid during the 2018-19 fiscal year.
June 11, 2019 at 02:29 PM
5 minute read
The government of Connecticut spent about $63 million from its adjudicated claims account for the 2018-2019 fiscal year to settle lawsuits, pay judgments and cover legal fees in cases that had sometimes lasted years.
State records show about 800 entries of payouts during that period from the account, shown as a line item from the General Fund. Of the $63 million, 93 percent went toward six major cases.
Here's a spending breakdown.
|Messier v. Southbury Training School
This suit resulted in $2.7 million in attorney fees and costs for plaintiff Richard Messier, whose counsel included Frank Laski of Boston-based Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee, Simsbury-based solo practitioner David Shaw and New Haven-based solo practitioner David Rosen.
The lawsuit stems from a 1994 class action against Connecticut's former Department of Mental Retardation, renamed the Department of Developmental Services, and the state's social services and public health departments over alleged inhumane living conditions at a state-run training school for people with intellectual disabilities.
By consent decree, the training school has not had new residents in about 20 years, bringing its population to fewer than 150, down from about 450 residents, according to Shaw.
“The place will close eventually,” Shaw said.
While the attorney fees were paid, Deputy Attorney General Peggy Chapple said the case will remain open to ensure continued vigilance as long as there are residents in the facility.
|SEBAC v. Rowland
This was the biggest litigation expense, with a $42.4 million payout to the State Employee Bargaining Agent Coalition to settle its class action lawsuit against former Gov. John Rowland.
The labor group sued Rowland, alleging he unfairly targeted 2,300 union members when he laid off state employees during a budget crisis. It moved for lost wages, missed promotions, and other economic damages, including unpaid vacation time and lost potential income for pension calculations.
The class consisted of every unionized state employee, or about 49,000 people, according to the deputy attorney general, Chapple, who teamed with Assistant Attorney General Alayna Stone to represent the state. About 3,000 of these members received compensation.
“We have spent the past three years calculating the damages,” Chapple told the Connecticut Law Tribune.
The case dates back to 2003 and dragged on for about 15 years. Many of the laid-off employees returned to work years later with settlement payments.
Stamford-based law firm Silver Golub & Teitell represented the plaintiffs, with partners David Golub and Jonathan Levine spearheading the litigation. Attorney fees for Silver Golub was not available at press time.
Horan v. State of Connecticut
The courts approved a $6.25 million settlement, awaiting Probate Court finalization after the Connecticut General Assembly signed off on the agreement.
The settlement stems from a 2007 lawsuit on behalf of Joseph Stavola and Jeanne Serocke and their young sons, James and William Stavola. A large tree fell on the car the four were traveling in along the Merritt Parkway, killing the parents and injuring the children.
The lawsuit alleged the state was negligent for failing to inspect, identify and remove the tree that was adjacent to the roadway and that the state should have known the tree posed a hazard to motorists.
The plaintiffs attorney is David Hill of Glastonbury-based David G. Hill & Associates.
Representing the state were attorneys within the Connecticut Attorney General's Office.
Angeles v. Connecticut
The Connecticut General Assembly approved a $4.9 million settlement in Angeles v. Connecticut in its 2019 session, and the case is now closed.
The lawsuit stemmed from a $20 million wrongful death lawsuit by North Carolina resident Hugo Angeles against the state Department of Children and Families in the 2011 death of his 3-year-old daughter Athena.
Athena's mother and the mother's live-in boyfriend were sentenced to prison for beating the child to death, according to the Hartford Courant. Hugo Angeles' lawsuit alleged DCF failed to remove Athena and her sister from an abusive home weeks before the girl's death.
The plaintiffs attorney was Robert Reardon Jr. of The Reardon Law Firm in New London, while the Connecticut Attorney General's Office represented the state.
|World v. Semple
Wayne World, a former prisoner, settled his medical neglect lawsuit against the state and Scott Semple, the head of Connecticut's Department of Correction, for $1.3 million.
World's attorneys maintained he was misdiagnosed for nearly three years with psoriasis, when he actually had an acute case of skin cancer. The misdiagnosis, his attorneys said, was neglectful and made World's condition worse over time. World received a second bone marrow transplant in 2018 and went through an aggressive chemotherapy regiment.
World, who was released early from prison in May 2018 due to his medical condition, was serving a 17-year prison term for manslaughter.
World's attorneys were Hartford-based solo practitioners Kenneth Krayeske and DeVaughn Ward.
Representing the state were attorneys from the Connecticut Attorney General's Office.
DCF Court Monitor
Part of the state's spending— $1,082,693—went toward the Department of Children and Families court monitor. Connecticut has been under a federal court monitor since 1992 and the payments are to continue the monitor and to ensure compliance, according to McClure.
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250