Employers are taking more concrete steps to address any #MeToo concerns within their own workplaces, according to The Littler Annual Employer Survey. Littler also found increased employer action around new federal and state regulations, as well as increased preparation for the impact of AI, automation and robotics on their organizations.
“Employers are more preoccupied than ever with preventing harassment and pay inequality in the second year of the #MeToo movement,” the authors write.
Littler polled 1,331 in-house counsel, human resources professionals and C-suite executives and found that many are doing more things across the board regarding these issues, compared to last year's survey.
To minimize sexual harassment, 63 percent are providing additional training to supervisors or employees, up from 55 percent in 2018; updating HR policies or handbooks (51 percent in 2019, up from 38 percent in 2018) and more proactively addressing complaints and potential misconduct (37 percent in 2019, up from 29 percent in 2018).
In addition, most employers are taking action to address gender pay equity, with 48 percent auditing salary data and pay practices and 24 percent revising hiring practices.
“Finally, severance and arbitration agreements have received greater attention as the #MeToo movement increases calls for transparency in how companies resolve sexual harassment claims,” the authors write. “This trend aligns with the finding…that 15 percent of respondents are re-examining severance and/or settlement agreements involving harassment claims in the wake of #MeToo.”
Other key survey findings include:
- Prior to the release of DOL's new proposed rule to revise the “white collar” overtime exemption regulations, 42 percent of respondents had already instituted changes, while 40 percent are reviewing job descriptions to verify the classification of current employees and 36 percent are auditing compensation to identify those employees likely to be impacted.
- Respondents over the next year expect an increase in EEOC workplace discrimination claims, particularly in harassment claims (61 percent), retaliation against employees who file discrimination or harassment claims (49 percent) and equal pay (47 percent).
- A majority (63 percent) say their companies are taking steps to address unconscious bias, “the 'mental shortcuts' that influence decision making in hiring, promotions and other areas.” More than a third (38 percent) have conducted training, and 26 percent have developed plans to improve diversity and inclusion.
- Respondents are starting to use AI or analytical tools in recruiting and hiring, with screening resumes or applications the most commonly cited method by 25 percent of respondents.
“However, the 63 percent who are not currently using AI-based tools suggests that there is far more potential for employers to leverage AI to support workforce management decisions,” the authors write.
Most employers are also taking some steps to prepare for the impact of robotics, AI and automation on the workplace—including identifying tasks that can be automated (37 percent) and hiring talent skilled in emerging technologies (22 percent)—“but there is work to be done, as 46 percent have not taken any action in this area,” they write.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Government Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250